Journal of Loomingulisus ja Innovatsioon
https://research.adra.ac.id/index.php/innovatsioon
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Journal of Loomingulisus ja Innovatsioon </strong>is an international peer-reviewed open-access journal dedicated to interchange for the results of high-quality research in all aspect of creativity and innovation. The scope of Journal of Loomingulisus ja Innovatsioon is not only in the form of study, research, or development, but also book review. But also focused on: developing creativity, innovation and leadership in various fields. The journal publishes state-of-art papers in fundamental theory, experiments, and simulation, as well as applications, with a systematic proposed method, sufficient review on previous works, expanded discussion, and concise conclusion. As our commitment to the advancement of science and technology, the Journal of Loomingulisus ja Innovatsioon follows the open access policy that allows the published articles freely available online without any subscription. Submitted papers must be written in English for initial review stage by editors and further review process by minimum two international reviewers.</p>Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbien-USJournal of Loomingulisus ja Innovatsioon3047-9452The "Dark Side" of Creativity: Exploring the Relationship Between Creativity and Unethical Behavior
https://research.adra.ac.id/index.php/innovatsioon/article/view/2807
<p>The growing body of research on creativity has traditionally highlighted its positive contributions to innovation and problem-solving, yet recent studies suggest that creativity may also facilitate unethical behavior. This study investigates the “dark side” of creativity by examining how creative potential and creative self-efficacy relate to morally questionable decision-making in organizational contexts. The research aims to clarify whether creativity inherently increases individuals’ capacity to rationalize misconduct or whether situational factors moderate this relationship. A mixed-method design was employed, combining a quantitative survey of 312 employees from diverse professional sectors with qualitative vignette-based interviews to probe moral reasoning processes. The findings indicate that higher creativity scores correlate with greater justification of rule-bending behaviors, particularly when individuals perceive ethical norms as ambiguous or organizational climates as permissive. However, creativity did not uniformly predict unethical actions; rather, the effect was contingent upon motivational orientations and moral disengagement tendencies. The study concludes that creativity is a dual-edged construct—capable of generating both adaptive and maladaptive outcomes—highlighting the need for ethical scaffolding in creative work environments. These insights contribute to a more nuanced understanding of creativity beyond its celebrated positive dimensions.</p> <p> </p>Miftahuddin MiftahuddinFaisal RazakSyafiq Amir
Copyright (c) 2025 Miftahuddin Miftahuddin, Faisal Razak, Syafiq Amir
https://research.adra.ac.id/index.php/innovatsioon/index
2025-12-242025-12-242631933110.70177/innovatsioon.v2i6.2807The Intersection of Art and Technology: A Study on Generative AI and its Implications for Human Creativity
https://research.adra.ac.id/index.php/innovatsioon/article/view/2808
<p>The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has redefined the boundaries between artistic creation and computational design, prompting critical debates on the evolving nature of human creativity. The rapid advancement of AI tools capable of producing visual art, music, and literature challenges traditional notions of authorship, originality, and aesthetic value. This study aims to explore the intersection of art and technology by examining how generative AI transforms creative processes and influences artistic identity. A qualitative research design employing case studies and thematic analysis was utilized to investigate the experiences of 15 artists and designers who integrate AI-based tools, such as DALL·E, Midjourney, and ChatGPT, into their creative workflows. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, artifact analysis, and digital ethnography. The findings reveal that generative AI functions as both a collaborator and a disruptor expanding creative possibilities while raising ethical and philosophical questions about human agency in artmaking. Participants reported enhanced productivity, conceptual exploration, and aesthetic experimentation, yet also expressed concerns about the loss of emotional authenticity and authorship. The study concludes that generative AI represents a paradigm shift toward co-creative art, necessitating new frameworks for understanding creativity, ethics, and digital aesthetics in the post-human era.</p> <p> </p>Hary MurcahyantoNapat ChaiSiri Lek
Copyright (c) 2025 Hary Murcahyanto, Napat Chai, Siri Lek
https://ejournal.unisbajambi.ac.id/index.php/attasyrih/index
2025-12-242025-12-242633234410.70177/innovatsioon.v2i6.2808