THE QUBIT PARADOX: WHY MORE QUBITS ACTUALLY LOWER ERROR RATES?

Miku Fujita (1), Ren Suzuki (2), Daiki Nishida (3)
(1) University of Kyoto, Japan,
(2) Nagoya University, Japan,
(3) Chuo University, Japan

Abstract

Physical qubits intuitively introduces greater cumulative noise and control complexity. This “Qubit Paradox” presents a fundamental barrier to scalability, suggesting that larger systems might become inherently less stable. This research aims to rigorously validate the threshold theorem, defining the precise boundary where topological protection overcomes physical noise accumulation. We utilized high-fidelity Monte Carlo simulations of Rotated Surface Codes, scaling from distance d=3 to d=9, under realistic circuit-level noise models including leakage and crosstalk. Decoding was executed using the Minimum Weight Perfect Matching (MWPM) algorithm to analyze logical failure rates across 109 error correction cycles. Results identify a critical physical error threshold of approximately 0.57%. Below this value, logical error rates exhibited exponential suppression via power-law decay, reducing by seven orders of magnitude at distance-9. Conversely, systems operating above this threshold demonstrated error amplification with increased scale. We conclude that the paradox resolves only when individual gate fidelity surpasses the threshold, mandating that hardware optimization must precede quantitative scaling. These findings establish a validated roadmap for the transition from the NISQ era to fault-tolerant architecture.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Acampora, G., Chiatto, A., Schiattarella, R., & Vitiello, A. (2026). Quantum artificial intelligence: A survey. Computer Science Review, 59, 100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100807

Aktar, M. S., Liang, P., Waseem, M., Tahir, A., Ahmad, A., Zhang, B., & Li, Z. (2025). Architecture decisions in quantum software systems: An empirical study on Stack Exchange and GitHub. Information and Software Technology, 177, 107587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107587

Alexeev, Y., Amsler, M., Barroca, M. A., Bassini, S., Battelle, T., Camps, D., Casanova, D., Choi, Y. J., Chong, F. T., Chung, C., Codella, C., Córcoles, A. D., Cruise, J., Di Meglio, A., Duran, I., Eckl, T., Economou, S., Eidenbenz, S., Elmegreen, B., … Zubarev, D. (2024). Quantum-centric supercomputing for materials science: A perspective on challenges and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 160, 666–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.04.060

Ali, S., Wadho, S. A., Talpur, K. R., Talpur, B. A., Alshudukhi, K. S., Humayun, M., Talpur, S. R., Mamun, M. A. A., Naseem, M., Abro, A., Talpur, D. B., & Shah, A. (2025). Next-Generation Quantum Security: The Impact of Quantum Computing on Cybersecurity—Threats, Mitigations, and Solutions. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 128, 110649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110649

An, S., & Choi, B.-S. (2025). Surface code model for Fibonacci helical pathways of the Orch OR microtubule. BioSystems, 249, 105414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105414

Barreto, A. G., Fanchini, F. F., Papa, J. P., & de Albuquerque, V. H. C. (2024). Why consider quantum instead classical pattern recognition techniques? Applied Soft Computing, 165, 112096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112096

Bel, O., & Kiran, M. (2025). Simulators for quantum network modeling: A comprehensive review. Computer Networks, 263, 111204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111204

Bellante, A., Fioravanti, T., Carminati, M., Zanero, S., & Luongo, A. (2025). Evaluating the potential of quantum machine learning in cybersecurity: A case-study on PCA-based intrusion detection systems. Computers & Security, 154, 104341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2025.104341

Bhajaj, P., Nalubolu, S., Gurram, B., Srinivas, M., Choudhary, R., Dai, W., Wang, L., Jamaspishvili, T., Ding, Z., & Guo, N. L. (2025). ClinSegAI: A post-processing framework for superior histopathology segmentation accuracy, radiomics feature preservation, and quantitative analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 199, 111298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111298

Blekos, K., Brand, D., Ceschini, A., Chou, C.-H., Li, R.-H., Pandya, K., & Summer, A. (2024). A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants. A Review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and Its Variants, 1068, 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002

Bradshaw, Z. P., Dale, J. J., & Evans, E. N. (2026). Introduction to quantum error correction with stabilizer codes. Annals of Physics, 487, 170353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2026.170353

Brady, A. J., Eickbusch, A., Singh, S., Wu, J., & Zhuang, Q. (2024). Advances in bosonic quantum error correction with Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill Codes: Theory, engineering and applications. Progress in Quantum Electronics, 93, 100496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2023.100496

Cranganore, S. S., De Maio, V., Brandic, I., & Deelman, E. (2024). Paving the way to hybrid quantum–classical scientific workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 158, 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.04.030

Du, Z., Wandelt, S., & Sun, X. (2026). Overcoming computational challenges in air transportation: A quantum computing perspective of the status quo and future applicability. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 184, 105505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2025.105505

Fukui, K., & Takeda, S. (2024). 12—Optical large-scale quantum computation. In Y. Arakawa & D. Bimberg (Eds.), Quantum Photonics (pp. 497–535). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-98378-5.00012-X

Gheorghiu, V., & Mosca, M. (2025). Quantum resource estimation for large scale quantum algorithms. Future Generation Computer Systems, 162, 107480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.107480

Gill, S. S., Wu, H., Patros, P., Ottaviani, C., Arora, P., Pujol, V. C., Haunschild, D., Parlikad, A. K., Cetinkaya, O., Lutfiyya, H., Stankovski, V., Li, R., Ding, Y., Qadir, J., Abraham, A., Ghosh, S. K., Song, H. H., Sakellariou, R., Rana, O., … Buyya, R. (2024). Modern computing: Vision and challenges. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 13, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100116

Glisic, S., & Lorenzo, B. (2024). Quantum computing and neuroscience for 6G/7G networks: Survey. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 23, 200346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200346

Jayan K., D., & Babu, K. (2025). Luminescent perovskite quantum dots: Progress in fabrication, modelling and machine learning approaches for advanced photonic and quantum computing applications. Journal of Luminescence, 277, 120906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2024.120906

Jin, Y. (2025). Google’s “Willow” quantum processor: New RCS record and first error correction below the surface code threshold. The Innovation, 6(7), 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2025.100942

Jones, J. A. (2024). Controlling NMR spin systems for quantum computation. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, 140–141, 49–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2024.02.002

Khodaiemehr, H., Bagheri, K., & Feng, C. (2026). Navigating the quantum computing threat landscape for blockchains: A comprehensive survey. Computer Science Review, 59, 100846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100846

Kuhn, R. L. (2024). A landscape of consciousness: Toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 190, 28–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.12.003

Kundu, S., Gupta, T., Sardar, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Swain, S., & Mallik, S. (2025). A survey on quantum computing: Transforming cryptography, AI/ML, blockchain, and network communication. Franklin Open, 12, 100371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fraope.2025.100371

Larasati, H. T., & Choi, B.-S. (2025). Towards fault-tolerant distributed quantum computation (FT-DQC): Taxonomy, recent progress, and challenges. ICT Express, 11(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2025.03.007

Lee, J., Omkar, S., Teo, Y. S., Lee, S.-H., Kwon, H., Kim, M. S., & Jeong, H. (2025). Photonic hybrid quantum computing. Newton, 100359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newton.2025.100359

Lin, C., Xu, R., & Li, Y. (2025). Design of an efficient fault-tolerant quantum-computing circuit with quantum neural network learning. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 153, 110808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110808

Meddeb, A. (2025). Quantum internet building blocks state of research and development. Computer Networks, 261, 111151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111151

Mimona, M. A., Mobarak, M. H., Ahmed, E., Kamal, F., & Hasan, M. (2024). Nanowires: Exponential speedup in quantum computing. Heliyon, 10(11), e31940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31940

Moon, K. (2025). The Fundamentals of Quantum Computing: A Journey into the Future. In Advances in Computers. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2025.06.004

Murugaraj, G., Krishnan, R., Harikrishnan, L., & Sellapan Kandasamy, M. (2026). Systematic Review on the Influence of Classical and Quantum Machine Learning in the Financial Sector. Data Science and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsm.2026.01.001

Nyirahafashimana, V., Mohd Shah, N., Halim, U. A., & Othman, M. (2026). Generalized code distance through rotated logical states in quantum error correction. Theoretical Computer Science, 1068, 115795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2026.115795

Rani, Pritam, Rani, Prity, & Sachan, R. K. (2025). Quantum blockchain for a greener tomorrow: A survey of emerging applications. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 124, 110322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110322

Ray, S., Bhattacharya, P., Mattar, E. A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2025). Coalition of explainable artificial intelligence and quantum computing in precision medicine. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 27, 5234–5251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.11.031

Yousuf, M. M., & Sofi, S. A. (2026). A systematic exploration of quantum software engineering in the NISQ era: Methods, lifecycle practices, and a taxonomy of challenges. Neurocomputing, 673, 132809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2026.132809

Authors

Miku Fujita
mikufujita@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Ren Suzuki
Daiki Nishida
Fujita, M., Suzuki, R. ., & Nishida, D. . (2025). THE QUBIT PARADOX: WHY MORE QUBITS ACTUALLY LOWER ERROR RATES?. Journal of Computer Science Advancements, 3(5), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsca.v3i5.3329

Article Details