Mentorship in Midwifery: The Role of Preceptors in Shaping Professional Identity
Abstract
Background. Mentorship is widely regarded as a crucial element in midwifery education, particularly in facilitating students’ transition from academic learning to professional clinical practice. Beyond technical skill acquisition, mentorship plays a significant role in shaping professional identity by influencing how midwifery students internalize professional values, responsibilities, and ethical standards within clinical settings. However, the mechanisms through which preceptors contribute to professional identity formation remain insufficiently explored.
Purpose. This study aimed to examine the role of clinical preceptors in shaping the professional identity of midwifery students during clinical placements, with a particular focus on mentorship practices that support identity development.
Method. The study employed a qualitative interpretive research design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, reflective journals, and non-participant observations involving midwifery students and experienced preceptors in clinical learning environments. The data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns related to mentorship interactions and professional identity formation processes.
Results. The findings indicate that preceptors exert a substantial influence on students’ professional identity through role modeling, professional validation, reflective dialogue, and the gradual negotiation of autonomy in clinical decision-making. Supportive and consistent mentorship was associated with enhanced self-confidence, ethical awareness, and a stronger sense of professional belonging. Conversely, fragmented or limited mentorship contributed to uncertainty and weaker integration of professional identity.
Conclusion. The study concludes that preceptorship functions as a formative relational process that extends beyond clinical supervision. It serves as a critical mechanism in the development of professional identity among midwifery students. Strengthening mentorship structures and enhancing preceptor preparation are therefore essential to fostering resilient, competent, and professionally grounded future midwives.
Full text article
References
Adnani, Q. E. S. (2023). A historical narrative of the development of midwifery education in Indonesia. Women and Birth, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.06.007
Alammary, M. A. (2023). 360-Degree Virtual Reality Utilising Head-Mounted Devices in Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Education: A Scoping Review. Virtual Worlds, 2(4), 396–421. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds2040023
Amirmahani, M. (2023). Biomechanical evaluation of midwifery tasks and its relationship with the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders: Biomechanical evaluation of midwifery tasks. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19442
Ashley, R. (2022). A call for critical midwifery studies: Confronting systemic injustice in sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn care: Critical Midwifery Collective Writing Group. Birth, 49(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12661
Ball, K. L. (2022). A literature review to determine midwifery students’ perceived essential qualities of preceptors to increase confidence and competence in the clinical environment. Women and Birth, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.06.010
Bonnamy, J. (2025). Australian and New Zealand nursing and midwifery educators’ planetary health knowledge, views, confidence and teaching practices: A descriptive survey study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(12), 8170–8181. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16317
Brereton, S. (2022). A blended learning perineal suturing programme for midwifery students: An evaluative descriptive study. Nurse Education in Practice, 64(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103453
Buerengen, T. (2022). Association between one-to-one midwifery care in the active phase of labour and use of pain relief and birth outcomes: A cohort of nulliparous women. Midwifery, 110(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103341
Çitil, E. T. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the future of midwifery: What do midwives think about artificial intelligence? A qualitative study. Health Care for Women International, 43(12), 1510–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2022.2055760
Crepinsek, M. (2023). A global review of the inferred meaning of woman centred care within midwifery professional standards. Women and Birth, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.05.001
Fahlbeck, H. (2022). ‘A longing for a sense of security’ – Women’s experiences of continuity of midwifery care in rural Sweden: A qualitative study. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 33(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100759
Fumagalli, S. (2022). Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the perceptions of empowerment in midwifery practice scale-revised (PEMS-R-IT) in midwives. European Journal of Midwifery, 6(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/146587
Georgieva-Tsaneva, G. (2025). Application of Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence, and Other Innovative Technologies in Healthcare Education (Nursing and Midwifery Specialties): Challenges and Strategies. Education Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010011
Grant, J. (2022). Are we there yet? A scoping review of factors that increase academic research capacity in schools of nursing and midwifery. Nurse Education in Practice, 63(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103355
Henshall, C. (2023). A nationwide initiative to increase nursing and midwifery research leadership: Overview of year one programme development, implementation and evaluation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(15), 5369–5381. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15558
Herndon, A. (2024). Associations Between State Practice Regulations and Access to Midwifery Care. Journal of Midwifery and Women S Health, 69(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13528
Janes, G. (2023). An international exploration of blended learning use in pre-registration nursing and midwifery education. Nurse Education in Practice, 66(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103514
Lee, T. (2022). Blended (online and in-person) Women’s Health Interprofessional Learning by Simulation (WHIPLS) for medical and midwifery students. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 62(4), 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13531
Li, T. (2023). A Bibliometric Analysis of Research Articles on Midwifery Based on the Web of Science. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58), 677–692. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S398218
LoGiudice, J. A. (2023). A Midwifery Perspective on Trauma-Informed Care Clinical Recommendations. Journal of Midwifery and Women S Health, 68(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13462
Martin-Arribas, A. (2022). A comparison between midwifery and obstetric care at birth in Spain: Across-sectional study of perinatal outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 126(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104129
Middlemiss, A. L. (2024). Barriers and facilitators when implementing midwifery continuity of carer: A narrative analysis of the international literature. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06649-y
Neal, S. (2023). An analysis of the global diversity of midwifery pre-service education pathways. Women and Birth, 36(5), 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.03.002
O’Connor, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in nursing and midwifery: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(13), 2951–2968. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16478
Paul, N. (2022). Burnout among midwives and attitudes toward midwifery: A cross-sectional study from Baden-Württemberg, Germany. European Journal of Midwifery, 6(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/150582
Prosen, M. (2022). A systematic integrative literature review of the factors influencing the professionalization of midwifery in the last decade (2009–2019). Midwifery, 106(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103246
Rumsey, M. (2022). Achieving Universal Health Care in the Pacific: The need for nursing and midwifery leadership. Review Paper. Lancet Regional Health Western Pacific, 19(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100340
Thumm, E. B. (2022). Burnout of the US midwifery workforce and the role of practice environment. Health Services Research, 57(2), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13922
Thumm, E. B. (2023). American Midwifery Certification Board Certification Demographic and Employment Data, 2016 to 2020: The Certified Nurse-Midwife and Certified Midwife Workforce. Journal of Midwifery and Women S Health, 68(5), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13511
Toll, K. (2024). Advanced midwifery practice: A scoping review. Women and Birth, 37(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.10.001
Vedam, S. (2022). Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: Opportunities for effective midwifery integration. Health Policy and Planning, 37(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czac032
Vogel, K. (2024). Augmented reality simulation-based training for midwifery students and its impact on perceived knowledge, confidence and skills for managing critical incidents. Midwifery, 136(Query date: 2026-02-24 22:56:58). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104064
Webber, E. (2022). Breastfeeding and Human Lactation Curriculum Survey of Midwifery Programs in the United States. Journal of Midwifery and Women S Health, 67(5), 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13367
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Sisilia Prima, Martti Tamm , Liis Rannala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.