PUBLIC HEALTH GOVERNANCE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POLICY RESPONSES IN INDONESIA AND VIETNAM
Article Sidebar
-
Covid-19, Indonesia, Public Health Governance, Policy Response, Vietnam
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has posed significant challenges to public health systems worldwide, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of governance structures in responding to such crises. Indonesia and Vietnam, two countries with contrasting health infrastructures and political systems, implemented various public health policies in response to the pandemic. A comparative analysis of their approaches provides valuable insights into effective governance during global health emergencies. This study aims to compare the public health governance and policy responses of Indonesia and Vietnam during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research focuses on examining the efficiency, effectiveness, and impact of these policies in controlling the spread of the virus and safeguarding public health. A qualitative comparative approach was used, involving document analysis, policy review, and expert interviews. Data were gathered from government reports, public health documents, and media sources, supplemented by interviews with policymakers and public health experts in both countries. The study reveals that Vietnam’s early and strict lockdown measures, robust contact tracing, and centralized decision-making significantly contained the virus spread, while Indonesia’s decentralized approach faced challenges in coordination and implementation, leading to higher infection rates. Vietnam’s unified, top-down approach to public health governance was more effective in managing the pandemic compared to Indonesia’s decentralized, regionally variable response. This study emphasizes the importance of strong leadership and clear policy coordination in future health crises.
Full text article
References
Alshdaifat, S. M., Abdul Hamid, M. A., Ab Aziz, N. H., Saidin, S. F., & Alhasnawi, M. Y. (2025). Corporate governance effectiveness and firm performance in global crisis: Evidence from GCC countries. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 25(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2023-0518
Bang, G. (2025). The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act: Climate policy as economic crisis response. Environmental Politics, 34(7), 1216–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2024.2437886
Chacon, R. G., Feng, Z., & Wu, Z. (2025). Does Investing in ESG Pay Off? Evidence from REITs. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 71(4), 587–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-09979-y
Correia, T., Kuhlmann, E., Lotta, G., Beja, A., Morais, R., Zapata, T., & Campbell, J. (2025). Turning the global health and care workforce crisis into action: The pathway to effective evidence?based policy and implementation. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 40(1), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3860
El Arab, R. A., Alkhunaizi, M., Alhashem, Y. N., Al Khatib, A., Bubsheet, M., & Hassanein, S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in vaccine research and development: An umbrella review. Frontiers in Immunology, 16, 1567116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1567116
Ferrara, F., Trama, U., Nava, E., Capuozzo, M., Zovi, A., Valentino, F., & Langella, R. (2025). Atrial fibrillation therapy with new oral anticoagulants: A real world evidence study. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 18(1), 128–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2273025
Jan, A. A., Lai, F.-W., Shah, S. Q. A., Tahir, M., Hassan, R., & Shad, M. K. (2025). Does Islamic corporate governance prevent bankruptcy in Islamic banks? Implications for economic sustainability. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 4(1), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-02-2023-0009
Ladi, S., & Polverari, L. (2025). Reconceptualising the EU-member states relationship in the age of permanent emergency. Comparative European Politics, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-024-00384-6
Li, N., Li, G., & Xue, J. (2025). Does ESG protect firms equally during crises? The role of supply chain concentration. Omega, 130, 103171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103171
Poier, S., & Suchanek, M. (2025). The effects of higher-order human values and conspiracy beliefs on COVID-19-related behavior in Germany. Journal of Public Health, 33(11), 2441–2456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02210-5
Sbai, H., & Ed-Dafali, S. (2025). Gender diversity and risk-taking: Evidence from dual banking systems. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(5), 1813–1836. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2022-0248
Schneider, K. R., Remans, R., Bekele, T. H., Aytekin, D., Conforti, P., Dasgupta, S., DeClerck, F., Dewi, D., Fabi, C., Gephart, J. A., Masuda, Y. J., McLaren, R., Saisana, M., Aburto, N., Ambikapathi, R., Arellano Rodriguez, M., Barquera, S., Battersby, J., Beal, T., … Fanzo, J. (2025). Governance and resilience as entry points for transforming food systems in the countdown to 2030. Nature Food, 6(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-01109-4
Truong, T. H. D. (2025). Environmental, social and governance performance and firm value: Does ownership concentration matter? Management Decision, 63(2), 488–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1993
Watermeyer, R., Bolden, R., Knight, C., & Crick, T. (2025). Academic anomie: Implications of the ‘great resignation’ for leadership in post-COVID higher education. Higher Education, 89(5), 1215–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01268-0
Zeitlin, J., Bokhorst, D., & Eihmanis, E. (2025). Governing the European Union’s recovery and resilience facility: National ownership and performance?based financing in theory and practice. Regulation & Governance, 19(3), 864–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12619
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Andrei Popescu, Maria Ionescu, Alexandru Stoica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
