DECENTRALIZATION AND REGIONAL AUTONOMY: AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SERVICE DISPARITIES AND GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES ACROSS INDONESIAN PROVINCES

Jacob Kanoa (1), Anna Reit (2), Mike Kintomw (3)
(1) College of Micronesia, Micronesia, Federated States of,
(2) University of the South Pacific, Micronesia, Federated States of,
(3) College of Micronesia, Micronesia, Federated States of

Abstract

Indonesia’s decentralization and regional autonomy reforms, implemented in the early 2000s, aimed to enhance local governance and improve public services. However, these reforms have led to varying outcomes across Indonesia’s provinces, with significant disparities in the quality and accessibility of public services. This study investigates how decentralization has influenced public service delivery and governance challenges in different regions, highlighting the uneven impacts of these reforms. This research aims to analyze the disparities in public service delivery across Indonesian provinces and the governance challenges resulting from the decentralization process. The study seeks to understand the factors contributing to these disparities and their implications for regional development and equity in public service provision. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data analysis from national and regional reports with qualitative interviews with local government officials and community leaders. The study examines key indicators of public service performance, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, across various provinces. The study reveals significant disparities in public service delivery, with wealthier and more urbanized provinces exhibiting better outcomes. Meanwhile, poorer and more remote regions face challenges in governance capacity and resource allocation, leading to uneven public service provision. The decentralization process in Indonesia has had mixed results, with regional autonomy contributing to greater governance flexibility but also deepening disparities in public service quality. Further reforms are necessary to address these inequities and strengthen local governance capabilities.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Alasiri, F., D?browski, M., Rocco, R., & Forgaci, C. (2025). The Impact of Recent Policies on the Transformation of Local Participatory Urban Planning in Saudi Arabia. Urban Science, 9(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9030069

Barceló, J., & Peisakhin, L. (2025). The Legacy of Multi-Dimensional Conflict. Comparative Political Studies, 00104140251381790. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251381790

Bianchi, L., & Prota, F. (2025). Differentiated autonomy. Contemporary Italian Politics, 17(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2025.2479352

Binsaeed, R. H., Khan, Z., Dogan, E., & Rahim, S. (2025). The role of energy efficiency, renewable resources, green innovation, and fiscal decentralization in sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries. Utilities Policy, 95, 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2025.101915

De Mello, L., & Jalles, J. T. (2025). Natural disasters and intergovernmental relations: More or less decentralisation? Regional Studies, 59(1), 2310116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2310116

Delfirman, & Dzaki, H. M. (2025). Shifts in the control of natural resources: An analysis of the resource curse in Tin-Rich Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 23, 101682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2025.101682

Fauzan, M., Prasojo, H., Ardhanariswari, R., & Elfudllatsani, B. (2025). Balancing Power and Resolving Conflicts in the Collaboration between Regional Heads and DPRD in Indonesia’s Decentralized Governance. E3S Web of Conferences, 609, 07004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202560907004

Ferrara, F., Trama, U., Nava, E., Capuozzo, M., Zovi, A., Valentino, F., & Langella, R. (2025). Atrial fibrillation therapy with new oral anticoagulants: A real world evidence study. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 18(1), 128–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2273025

Has Regional Hospital Autonomy Achieved Its Goals? Lessons Learned from Indonesia: A Systematic Review. (2025). Kesmas Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Nasional (National Public Health Journal), 20(3). https://doi.org/10.7454/kesmas.v20i3.2248

Kapelela, C., Mislay, M. A., & Manyengo, P. R. (2025). The politics of school governance in the context of education decentralisation policy reforms in selected public secondary schools in Tanzania. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2442251. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2442251

Lublin, D. (2025). Extreme events, decentralisation and the effective number of parties. Regional Studies, 59(1), 2311739. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2311739

Nordholm, D., Jarl, M., & Wermke, W. (2025). School Leader Autonomy – a Systematic Review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 0013161X251349562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X251349562

Rugeiyamu, R., & Msendo, A. (2025). Success, challenges and prospects of decentralization in Africa: A systematic review. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2458700. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2458700

Singh, R., Bhattacharjee, S., & Nandy, A. (2025). Does regional decentralisation preserve the spirit of federal polity in India? Regional Studies, 59(1), 2441222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2441222

Tinambunan, H. S. R., Istislam, Hadiyantina, S., Kusumaningrum, A., & Tajudin, A. A. (2025). Recentralization of Mining Licensing Authority and Its Impact on Local Autonomy in Indonesia. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 7(2), 520–539. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v7n2.p520-539

Widiarto, A. E., Hassan, M. S., Rusli, M. H. M., & Setiawan, E. B. (2025). The authority relationship of Central and Local Governments in forming laws and regulations: Between Indonesia and Malaysia. Legality?: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.36629

Authors

Jacob Kanoa
jacob@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Anna Reit
Mike Kintomw
Kanoa, J., Reit, A. ., & Kintomw, M. . (2025). DECENTRALIZATION AND REGIONAL AUTONOMY: AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SERVICE DISPARITIES AND GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES ACROSS INDONESIAN PROVINCES. Cognitionis Civitatis Et Politicae, 2(5), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.70177/politicae.v2i5.3139

Article Details