MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR REAL-TIME DETECTION AND PREDICTION OF SEISMIC ACTIVITIES TO ENHANCE DISASTER RISK MITIGATION STRATEGIES
Abstract
Earthquakes pose significant threats to human safety, critical infrastructure, and socioeconomic stability because their occurrence is highly complex and difficult to predict accurately in real time. Although conventional seismic monitoring systems have improved earthquake detection, they remain limited by computational constraints, delayed event recognition, and inadequate identification of nonlinear seismic patterns. This study evaluated the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms for real-time seismic detection and prediction and their contribution to disaster risk mitigation. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed using approximately 1.8 million seismic waveform segments representing 48,000 earthquake events collected from 320 monitoring stations across eight tectonically active regions. Quantitative analyses included comparative evaluation of supervised, ensemble, and deep learning algorithms using multivariate statistics, structural equation modeling, hierarchical regression, mediation, and moderation analyses, while qualitative evidence was examined through thematic analysis. Findings showed that deep learning and hybrid ensemble models consistently achieved higher prediction accuracy, computational efficiency, early warning reliability, and lower false alarm rates than conventional approaches. Improved prediction accuracy strengthened disaster response readiness, while dense sensor networks and institutional coordination enhanced operational effectiveness, supporting resilient earthquake risk mitigation and evidence-based emergency decision-making.
Full text article
References
Ansari, F., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., & Shakibaei, H. (2025). A data-driven multi-stage stochastic optimization for sustainable humanitarian supply chain using machine learning algorithms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 161, 112133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112133
Aroquipa, H., Hurtado, A., Murga, C., De La Cruz, R., & Tarque, N. (2025). Towards smart Cities: Foundational methodology for implementing intelligent circular resilience in heritage buildings through structural health monitoring and digital-twins – Part A. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 128, 105749. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105749
Asare-Bediako, B., Boateng, C. D., Opoku, N., Danuor, S. K., Arthur, L. N. B., & Anokwa, Y. M. (2024). Seismic activities in Ghana: A systematic review. Heliyon, 10(10), e31536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31536
Centeno, R., Gómez-Salcedo, V., Lazarte, I., Vilca-Nina, J., Osores, S., & Mayhua-Lopez, E. (2024). Near-real-time multiparametric seismic and visual monitoring of explosive activity at Sabancaya volcano, Peru. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 451, 108097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108097
Chang, F., Dong, S., Yin, H., Ye, X., Wu, Z., Zhang, W., & Zhu, H. (2025). 3D displacement time series prediction of a north-facing reservoir landslide powered by InSAR and machine learning. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 17(7), 4445–4461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.10.033
Chen, L., Chang, M., Yang, H., Xiao, Y., Huang, H., & Wang, X. (2024). Comprehensive evaluation and optimal management of extreme disaster risk in Chinese urban agglomerations by integrating resilience risk elements and set pair analysis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111, 104671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104671
Chishtie, F. A., & Clague, J. J. (2025). Risky ground: Seismic hazards and transectional networks in the Pacific northwest. Progress in Disaster Science, 28, 100483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100483
Devi D, R., Govindarajan, P., & N, V. (2024). Towards real-time earthquake forecasting in Chile: Integrating intelligent technologies and machine learning. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 117, 109285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109285
Espinosa-Curilem, C., Basualto, D., Curilem, M., & Huenupan, F. (2025). Volcano Seismic Event Recognition and OOD Detection using Multi-Representation Deep Learning: Insights from Nevados del Chillán. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 466, 108406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2025.108406
Fayaz, J., Astroza, R., & Ruiz, S. (2025). An Interpretable and Domain-Informed Real-Time Hybrid Earthquake Early Warning for Ground Shaking Intensity Prediction. Engineering, 49, 190–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2025.03.009
Fowdur, T. P., Appadoo, S. S., Cowlessur, M., Gooroochurn, M., Doomah, Z., Jogee, D., & Hurbungs, V. (2025). A cloud-based landslide and weather nowcasting system with collaborative machine learning for the Chitrakoot region in Mauritius. Measurement: Digitalization, 2–3, 100008. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meadig.2025.100008
Gacitua, R. (2025). IMM: An Integrated Maturity Model for enhancing disaster resilience: A comparative analysis and framework proposal. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 129, 105781. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105781
Gamboa-Chacón, S., Meneses, E., & Chaves, E. J. (2025). Analysis of earthquake detection using deep learning: Evaluating reliability and uncertainty in prediction methods. Computers & Geosciences, 197, 105877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105877
Gentili, S., Chiappetta, G. D., Petrillo, G., Brondi, P., & Zhuang, J. (2025). Forecasting strong subsequent earthquakes in Japan using an improved version of NESTORE machine learning algorithm. Geoscience Frontiers, 16(3), 102016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102016
Hu, J., Zhang, Z., Zhu, X., Zhang, X., Yang, S., Huang, C., Wang, W., Li, X., Hou, L., & Zhao, L. (2025). Geological hazard susceptibility assessment and forecasting analysis based on InSAR and C-L-A model. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 143, 104840. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2025.104840
Ineza, W. B., Izere, E. C., Sonnenschein, R., Kukunda, C. B., Tumwebaze, F., Shumbusho, R., & Razak, K. A. (2025). Application of geospatial and ICT technologies for landslide disaster risk reduction in Rwanda. Progress in Disaster Science, 28, 100466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2025.100466
Jiang, J., Murray, D., Stankovic, V., Stankovic, L., Hibert, C., Pytharouli, S., & Malet, J.-P. (2025). A human-on-the-loop approach for labelling seismic recordings from landslide site via a multi-class deep-learning based classification model. Science of Remote Sensing, 11, 100189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2024.100189
Jiang, J., Xiong, C., Xu, Z., Mei, L., Li, L., & Long, W. (2025). Game engine-empowered digital twin for seismic damage simulation of buildings. Engineering Structures, 330, 119839. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119839
Jiang, X., & Zheng, H. (2025). Sustainable Emergency Rescue Products: Design and Monitoring Techniques for Preventing and Mitigating Construction Failures in Unforeseen Circumstances. SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 19(6), 1695–1716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32604/sdhm.2025.063890
Kaushal, A., Gupta, A. K., & Sehgal, V. K. (2025). Earthquake prediction optimization using deep learning hybrid RNN-LSTM model for seismicity analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 195, 109432. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109432
Kiyingi, W., Xiong, R., Jin, Y., & Guo, J. (2025). Geological carbon dioxide storage and subsurface rock mechanics—geomechanical risks, modelling practices, and risk mitigation strategies. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 144, 103195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2025.103195
Li, Y., Sun, Z., Mangalathu, S., Li, Y., Yang, H., & He, W. (2025). Seismic damage states prediction of in-service bridges using feature-enhanced swin transformer without reliance on damage indicators. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 159, 111651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111651
Liu, B., Wen, H., Di, M., Huang, J., Liao, M., Yu, J., & Xiang, Y. (2025). Mapping and interpretability of aftershock hazards using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 17(8), 4908–4932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.09.015
Liu, L., Nie, F., Liu, C., & Wang, H. (2025). Seismic Pulse Dataset (SPD): A new dataset for ground motion pulse recognition. Engineering Structures, 337, 120454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120454
Manikandan, K., Nidhi, M., Micelli, F., Cascardi, A., & Sivasubramanian, M. V. R. (2025). Seismic vulnerability assessment of slender masonry structures: A machine learning approach with vibration-based assessment and nonlinear dynamic analysis. Structures, 79, 109272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109272
Markom, A. M., Saharudin, S., & Hisham, M. H. (2025). Systematic review of fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing: advancements, applications, and challenges. Optical Fiber Technology, 94, 104293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2025.104293
Mukherjee, B., Shaw, R. L., Sharma, M. L., & Sain, K. (2025). Earthquake prediction using machine learning perspectives in Himalayan seismic belt and its surroundings. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 293, 106764. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2025.106764
Mwanza, J., Mashumba, P., & Telukdarie, A. (2024). A Framework for Monitoring Stability of Tailings Dams in Realtime Using Digital Twin Simulation and Machine Learning. Procedia Computer Science, 232, 2279–2288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.047
Nurtas, M., Altaibek, A., Ydyrys, Z., & Kumarkhanova, A. (2025). Supervised Learning for Earthquake Forecasting in the Almaty Seismic Zone. Procedia Computer Science, 272, 139–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.189
Nurtas, M., Altaibek, A., & Zakir, D. (2025). LSTM-Based Forecasting of Seismic Events Using Geomagnetic Indices with Balanced Training. Procedia Computer Science, 272, 147–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.190
Peng, K., Zhou, W., Jiang, L., Peng, M., & Xiong, L. (2025). An efficient seismic damage prediction method for high-speed railway track-bridge systems based on multi-task learning. Engineering Structures, 330, 119913. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119913
Peng, M., Motagh, M., Lu, Z., Xia, Z., Guo, Z., Zhao, C., & Liu, Q. (2024). Characterization and prediction of InSAR-derived ground motion with ICA-assisted LSTM model. Remote Sensing of Environment, 301, 113923. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113923
Peng, Q., Wen, X., Jia, H., Pan, Y., Gu, X., Yin, C., & Chen, B. (2025). A novel sensor-independent convolutional neural network for structural damage detection: Illustrated by a case study on gantry crane. Structures, 71, 107971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107971
Que-Salinas, U., Torres-Orozco, R., Sieron, K., Juárez-Cerrillo, S. F., & Córdoba-Montiel, F. (2025). Neural networks-based ‘first-response’ detection of volcano-tectonic seismic events in poorly monitored active volcanoes: the case of Pico de Orizaba (Citlaltépetl), Mexico. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 166, 105756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105756
Rahman, S., Fahim Faisal, M., Mondal, P., & Mahfuzur Rahman, M. (2025). Tropical cyclone track prediction harnessing deep learning algorithms: A comparative study on the Northern Indian Ocean. Results in Engineering, 26, 105009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105009
Ray, P. P. (2024). ChatGPT in transforming communication in seismic engineering: Case studies, implications, key challenges and future directions. Earthquake Science, 37(4), 352–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2024.04.003
Shehzad, A., Xiu-Xin, W., Akbar, M., Siddiqui, N. A., Yosri, A. M., Alzara, M., Kashif, M., & Zaghloul, Y. (2025). A systematic review on seismic resilience in high-rise structures to enhance outrigger systems. Structures, 82, 110753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.110753
Xu, W., Yan, G., You, D., Muhsen, S., Elattar, S., Ali, H. E., & Escorcia-Gutierrez, J. (2025). Creation of an advanced intelligent system for enhancing seismic and flood resilience in the design of real-time monitored structural frameworks. Structures, 80, 109837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109837
Xuan, Y., Geiß, C., Mu, H., Niu, D., Guo, B., & Deng, Y. (2025). Instance segmentation techniques for seismic building structural type estimation from remote sensing imagery – Evidence from Xi’an city, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 127, 105686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105686
Ye, G., Wu, Q., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Tu, Y., Wan, Y., & Yang, P. (2024). Electrokinetically propelled digital pendulum for seismic alert. Chemical Engineering Journal, 500, 157338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.157338
Zheng, L., Lin, S., Guo, H., Cao, X., & Zheng, H. (2025). Real-time rockburst assessment based on a novel hybrid convolutional long short-term memory network based on microseismic monitoring data. Engineering Failure Analysis, 169, 109191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109191
Zheng, S., Nishimura, S., Shibata, T., & Chen, Y. (2024). Quantitative risk assessment for overtopping of earth-fill dams in Japan using machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 113, 104892. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104892
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Nofirman Nofirman, Daiki Nishida, Giovanni Rossi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.