GHARAR (UNCERTAINTY) AND ALGORITHMIC MANAGEMENT: ENSURING LABOR EQUITY FOR GIG WORKERS UNDER ISLAMIC CONTRACT LAW
Abstract
The rapid growth of gig-economy platforms has introduced algorithmic management systems that control work allocation, pricing, performance evaluation, and disciplinary actions. These systems often generate significant uncertainty for workers, including unstable income, unpredictable job availability, and opaque decision-making. In Islamic economic jurisprudence, such uncertainty constitutes Gharar, which is prohibited because it can lead to injustice and exploitation in contractual relations. This study examines how Gharar is embedded in algorithmic management practices and evaluates the potential of Islamic contract law to promote labor equity in the gig economy. The research aims to identify sources of uncertainty in platform algorithms, assess their impacts on workers, and propose Shariah-compliant contractual models that reduce Gharar while preserving technological efficiency. A qualitative research design was adopted, incorporating document analysis of platform policies, in-depth interviews with gig workers, and thematic analysis guided by Islamic legal principles. Comparative interpretation between conventional algorithmic management systems and Shariah-based contractual norms was used to evaluate ethical compliance. The findings indicate high levels of Gharar in dynamic pricing, automated sanctions, and non-negotiable digital contracts, resulting in income instability, informational asymmetry, and reduced worker autonomy. Applying Islamic contract principles—particularly transparency, risk-sharing, and mutual consent—offers practical mechanisms for mitigating these problems. The study concludes that aligning algorithmic management with Shariah contract law can enhance labor fairness, reduce uncertainty, and strengthen ethical governance in digital labor markets.
Full text article
References
Ahmed, H. (2024). Security tokens, ecosystems and financial inclusion: Islamic perspectives. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(4), 730–745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-04-2024-0195
Aisyah, M., Sesunan, Y. S., & Wicaksono, A. T. S. (2025). Customers’ trust in Islamic banking post-cyberattack leads to digital service breakdowns in Indonesia. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101530
Alsaghir, M. (2023). Digital risks and Islamic FinTech: a road map to social justice and financial inclusion. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2022-0262
Billah, M., Elsayed, A. H., Rabbani, M. R., & Shaik, M. (2025). Decoding investment strategies across agricultural commodities, Islamic equities, and Sukuk markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 80, 103097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103097
Billah, M., Enamul Hoque, M., Hadhri, S., & Do, H. X. (2025). Tail risk connectedness between DeFi and Islamic assets and their determinants. International Review of Economics & Finance, 97, 103789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103789
Billah, S. M., Kapar, B., Hassan, M. K., Pezzo, L., & Rabbani, M. R. (2024). Tail-risk connectedness between sukuk and conventional bond markets and their determinants: Evidence from a country-level analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.11.005
Bok, J. (2024). Monotonic market change: How contracting/expanding Protestant markets impact the founding of American Protestant international ministries. Social Science Research, 119, 102987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.102987
El Mansoum, R., & Chfadi, T. (2025). Innovation without participation? Moroccan farmers’ perspectives on Haouz Mejjat aquifer contract. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 30, 101477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101477
Fouladiyan, M., & Kaboli, A. (2025). Experience of violence perception among Iranian female sex workers and their strategies in confronting violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 111, 103127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103127
Ghaemi Asl, M., Nasr Isfahani, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2024). How does the mineral resource exploitation sector interact with Islamic and traditional ventures? Insights amidst the impact of green reforms and state-of-the-art technological advancements. Resources Policy, 98, 105287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105287
Ghaemi Asl, M., Rashidi, M. M., Tavakkoli, H. R., & Rezgui, H. (2024). Does Islamic investing modify portfolio performance? Time-varying optimization strategies for conventional and Shariah energy-ESG-utilities portfolio. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 94, 37–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.12.010
Hajipour Farsangi, R., Mahdavi, G., Jafari Khaledi, M., Büyükyaz?c?, M., & Ghanbarzadeh, M. (2024). Pricing risk contribution of general Takaful by spatial generalized linear mixed models at the level of tariff cells. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(4), 811–830. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2024-0027
Haruna, A., Oumbé, H. T., Kountchou, A. M., & Pilag Kakeu, C. B. (2024). Can Islamic finance enhance the innovation capacity of Cameroonian SMEs? Empirical evidence based on a multivariate probit approach. Borsa Istanbul Review, 24(1), 187–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.11.006
Iqbal, M. S., Fikri, S. M., Mahmood, S., Hassan, M., Soharwardi, M. A., & Rana, A. (2025). Impact of globalization on resilience of Islamic and conventional banks in Pakistan post-COVID-19: A smart PLS approach. Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance, 8, 100090. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsef.2025.100090
I??k, Ö., Adalar, ?., & Shabir, M. (2025). Measuring efficiency, productivity and sustainability performance for ?slamic banks: a fuzzy expert-based multi-criteria decision support model using spherical fuzzy information. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(6), 1482–1519. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2024-0477
Khawaldeh, A. M. (2024). Legal nature of the court’s discretionary power in business contract revocation. International Journal of Law and Management, 67(5), 505–522. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2024-0076
Lee, W. H. (2024). Reclaiming the “good women” identity: A case study of Surabaya’s Muslim sex workers negotiating Islam and sex work. Asian Journal of Social Science, 52(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2024.04.002
Parvin, S. M. R., Panakaje, N., Sheikh, N., P., M. T., Irfana, S., Kulal, A., V., M., Shahid, M., N.M., A. B., & Nihal, M. (2024). An empirical analysis of stock market participation: from an Islamic perspective. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2024-0287
Penella, D. A. B., Schmitz, F. R., Tan, Y., Antunes, J., Wanke, P., M Julkar Naeen Abir, S., & Abul Kalam Azad, M. (2025). Strategic fit of potential M&As between dual banks and conventional banks: Does Islamic banking matter? Research in International Business and Finance, 77, 102876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102876
Purusottama, A., & Simatupang, T. M. (2025). Adoption of blockchain technology in promoting halal compliance. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(9), 2679–2702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2023-0423
Purusottama, A., Sunitiyoso, Y., & Simatupang, T. M. (2023). Exploring the potential of blockchain adoption for promoting value innovation: a case of the halal industry. Business Process Management Journal, 29(7), 2034–2058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-04-2023-0267
Puspitasari, N., Mufidah, A., Prihatini, D., Muhsyi, A., & Suroso, I. (2024). Proposing a corporate governance model for an Islamic property developer. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 17(5), 1329–1348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-02-2024-0017
Raza, M. W., & Ye, J. (2024). Beyond Sharpe ratio: comparison of risk-adjusted performance of Shariah-compliant and conventional indices. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2024-0013
Tanin, T. I., Shaiban, M. S. M., Hasanov, A. S., & Brooks, R. (2025). Resilience and performance of Islamic and conventional banks amid oil price uncertainty. Energy Economics, 148, 108637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108637
Veneziano Labanca, G., Fontanari, E., & Sala, E. (2025). Precarious workers on the move the migrantisation of Italian healthcare professionals in Germany. Mobilities, 20(5), 835–852. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2025.2481313
Wulandari, P., Sulung, L. A. K., Yuliati, E., Chalid, D. A., & Kassim, S. (2025). Rational vs religious: which is more important for ultramicro SMEs when dealing with financial institutions? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(7), 1998–2018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2024-0194
Younis, I., Du, A. M., Gupta, H., & Shah, W. U. (2024). Dynamic spillover effects and interconnectedness of DeFi assets, commodities, and Islamic stock markets during crises. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103563
Yüksel, S., Kalyoncu, G., & Özdurak, C. (2023). Constructing an index for participation finance. Borsa Istanbul Review, 23(4), 895–905. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2023.03.003
Zaman, A., Tlemsani, I., Matthews, R., & Mohamed Hashim, M. A. (2023). Assessing the potential of blockchain technology for Islamic crypto assets. Competitiveness Review, 35(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-05-2023-0100
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Hale Yilmaz, Omar Ahmad, James Smit

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.