Impact Investing vs. Philanthropy: A Comparative Analysis of Funding Models for Long-Term Sustainability in Social Entrepreneurship

Murah Murah (1), Rashid Rahman (2), Robert Harris (3)
(1) Universitas Gunung Rinjani Lombok, Indonesia,
(2) Universiti Putra, Malaysia,
(3) Columbia University, United States

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship has emerged as a critical force for addressing complex global challenges. However, the long-term sustainability of these ventures remains a significant hurdle. A central debate within the sector concerns the efficacy of its two primary funding paradigms: traditional grant-based philanthropy, which prioritizes social outcomes, and market-driven impact investing, which demands both social and financial returns. This research provides a rigorous comparative analysis of impact investing and philanthropic funding models. It specifically investigates how each model distinctly influences the long-term operational and financial sustainability, scalability, and mission integrity of established social enterprises. A qualitative, multiple case study methodology was employed. The study analyzed a purposively selected sample of (n=12) mature social enterprises, stratified into two cohorts: six funded primarily by philanthropy and six funded primarily by impact capital. Data were gathered via semi-structured interviews with founders/CEOs and longitudinal analysis of organizational reports and financial statements. The findings indicate that philanthropic funding is essential for early-stage risk-taking and deep-impact programming but often correlates with restricted growth and long-term funding dependency. Conversely, impact investing successfully drives operational discipline and scalability. This model, however, introduces significant pressures that increase the risk of “mission drift” as enterprises prioritize financial benchmarks over core social objectives. Neither funding model is unilaterally superior. The research concludes that long-term sustainability in social entrepreneurship is not an “either/or” proposition. It is best achieved through a strategically phased, hybrid financial ecosystem that leverages philanthropy for mission-critical capacity-building and impact investing for scaling proven, market-based solutions.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Abdeldayem, M., Baqi, A., & Aldulaimi, S. (2024). Empowering stakeholder engagement and decision-making in future nuclear organisations: a multilevel research framework for challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(8), 2442–2468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2024-4644

Albino, F., Doh, J., Garrone, P., & Piscitello, L. (2025). Non-market strategies and firms’ organizational performance. Evidence from the energy sector in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Research, 190, 115211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115211

Baird, S., Choonara, S., Azzopardi, P. S., Banati, P., Bessant, J., Biermann, O., Capon, A., Claeson, M., Collins, P. Y., De Wet-Billings, N., Dogra, S., Dong, Y., Francis, K. L., Gebrekristos, L. T., Groves, A. K., Hay, S. I., Imbago-Jácome, D., Jenkins, A. P., Kabiru, C. W., … Viner, R. M. (2025). A call to action: the second Lancet Commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. The Lancet, 405(10493), 1945–2022. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00503-3

Baltazar, J. R., Ferreira, J. J., & Hughes, M. (2025). What do we know about strategic approaches to family businesses succession? A systematic review and future agenda. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 41(2), 101396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101396

Blankesteijn, M. L., & Ghorbani, A. (2025). Embracing the digital horizon: Future scenarios for the Dutch higher education system. Futures, 174, 103702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103702

Bringas-Fernández, V., López-Gutiérrez, C., & Pérez, A. (2024). B-CORP certification and financial performance: A panel data analysis. Heliyon, 10(17), e36915. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36915

Casprini, E., Palumbo, R., & De Massis, A. (2024). Untangling the yarn: A contextualization of human resource management to the family firm setting. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 15(3), 100621. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2024.100621

Dahrouj, R., Itani, O. S., Hollebeek, L. D., Eslami, H., & Kassar, A.-N. (2025). Which corporate social responsibility (CSR) approach optimizes customer engagement behavior? The role of customer-brand identification, brand love, and social communication. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84, 104230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104230

Daum, T., Scheiterle, L., Yameogo, V., Adegbola, Y. P., Mulinge, W., Kergna, A. O., Daudu, C., Angara, U. A., Zossou, R. C., Nientao, A., Fatunbi, O., Isuyi, L., & Birner, R. (2025). Moving beyond the productivity paradigm: Agricultural innovation systems and sustainable transformation in Africa. Agricultural Systems, 229, 104445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104445

Demattos Guimarães, A., Maehle, N., & Bonet, L. (2024). The relational forms of cultural-creative crowdfunding: A typology of practices through mapping platforms in Europe and Latin America. Poetics, 105, 101913. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101913

Dinh, J. M., Isaak, A. J., & Wehner, M. C. (2024). Sustainability-oriented crowdfunding: An integrative literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, 141579. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141579

Donald, W. E., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Baruch, Y. (2024). Introducing a sustainable career ecosystem: Theoretical perspectives, conceptualization, and future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 151, 103989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103989

Fang, L., He, L., & Huang, L. (2025). Stock market liberalization and exports of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 103, 102182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102182

González G. Vega, A., Olmo, B. T., & de la Cuesta-González, M. (2025). A multistakeholder approach to impact investing: Focus on institutional investors and key dimensions. Research in International Business and Finance, 75, 102766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102766

Hilton, J. (2025). An integrated analysis of greenhush. Innovation and Green Development, 4(2), 100222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2025.100222

Jahre, M., van Oorschot, K., Årdal, C., Sverrisson, E., Pettersen, M. S., & Wangen, A. (2025). Sustainable pharmaceutical procurement: Environmental tendering criteria for better or worse? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 101081. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2025.101081

Kangas, E., Joensuu-Salo, S., & Viljamaa, A. (2024). Is CSR a solution for crisis? Assessing the impact of three CSR dimensions on SME performance in the Nordic context. Baltic Journal of Management, 20(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2024-0156

Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2024). From empathetic hearts to digital hands: A study of compassion and donation behavior in social media advertising. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79, 103855. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103855

Kuriansky, J., & Kakkattil, P. B. T.-R. H. (Eds.). (2024). Index (pp. 1249–1277). Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18529-8.09970-4

L. Scott, M., Mende, M., & García Ramón, L. (2025). Inclusivity in the marketplace through the lens of social-movements and counter-movements theories. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115058

Leitão, M. E., Amaral, M., & Carvalho, A. (2024). Reconceptualizing socio-tech entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Technovation, 134, 103018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103018

Liu, A., Shu, C., & Xiao, Z. (2024). Entrepreneurial orientation, political ties, and corporate reputation: The moderating roles of institutional environments. Journal of Business Research, 170, 114347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114347

Ma?ecka, A., Mróz-Gorgo?, B., Rusin, K., Mitr?ga, M., & Pfajfar, G. B. T.-R. M. in S. S. (2024). Unlocking sustainable social innovation in operations: Embracing collaborative consumption through an Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) lens. Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-28993-4.00060-3

Marie, M., Qi, B., Elgammal, M., & Elnahass, M. (2024). A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 96, 102056. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.102056

Mashelkar, R. A., Shah, A., & Thomas, S. (2024). Rethinking innovation policy in India: Amplifying spillovers through contracting-out. Accounting Theory and Practice, 1, 100004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accoth.2024.100004

Matus-Ruiz, M., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Carillo, J. (2025). How institutional voids are experienced and enacted through social innovation initiatives by multinationals in emerging markets. International Business Review, 34(2), 102382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102382

Milanov, H., Prantl, K., Sheppard, S., & Ge, X. (2025). “I could, but why should I?”: Entrepreneurial women’s career pathways and how founding fits in (or doesn’t). Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 23, e00516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00516

Pacheco, J. N., Turro, A., & Urbano, D. (2025). Open social innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 216, 124160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124160

Power, S., Di Domenico, M., & Miller, G. (2024). A longitudinal analysis of judgement approaches to sustainability paradoxes. Tourism Management, 102, 104877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104877

Rosca, E., & Taylor, K. M. (2024). Delivering societal impact through supply chain design: insights from B Corps. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(10), 1750–1779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2022-0444

Ryandono, M. N. H., Widiastuti, T., Filianti, D., Robani, A., Al Mustofa, M. U., Susilowati, F. D., Wijayanti, I., Dewi, E. P., & Atiya, N. (2025). Overcoming barriers to optimizing cash waqf linked sukuk: A DEMATEL-ANP approach. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101588

Saka-Helmhout, A., Álamos-Concha, P., Polo-Barceló, C., Edwards, T., & Murray, G. (2024). Corporate social innovation by multinationals: A framework for future research. International Business Review, 33(5), 102273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102273

Sarker, M. S., & Elnahas, A. (2025). CEO cultural heritage and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 94, 102857. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102857

Shahid, Z. A., Tariq, M. I., Paul, J., Naqvi, S. A. N., & Hallo, L. (2024). Signaling theory and its relevance in international marketing: a systematic review and future research agenda. International Marketing Review, 41(2), 514–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2022-0092

Talan, G., Sharma, G. D., Pereira, V., & Muschert, G. W. (2024). From ESG to holistic value addition: Rethinking sustainable investment from the lens of stakeholder theory. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103530

Tang, R. W., & Wang, Y. (2025). The length of historical path and the digitalization speed of record labels: A path dependence perspective. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115150

Taylor, K. M., & Rosca, E. (2024). Toward a moral approach to stakeholder management: insights from the inclusion of marginalized stakeholders in the operations of social enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(10), 1831–1858. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2022-0549

von Rosing Volume 2, M. B. T.-T. S. H. (Ed.). (2025). Index (pp. 907–921). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90421-6.09999-3

Weng, C., Liu, M. J., Luo, J., & Yannopoulou, N. (2024). B2B social media use as a double-edged sword on trust: a social presence theory perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(5), 1769–1794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2024-0008

Zhou, J., Liu, W., & Li, J. (2024). Performance implications of a corporate political strategy in Chinese firms: State versus market logics in different institutional settings. Long Range Planning, 57(3), 102439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102439

Authors

Murah Murah
yusufmurah@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Rashid Rahman
Robert Harris
Murah, M., Rahman, R., & Harris, R. (2025). Impact Investing vs. Philanthropy: A Comparative Analysis of Funding Models for Long-Term Sustainability in Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Creative Technology, 2(4), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.70177/jseact.v2i4.2595

Article Details