Indonesian Bankruptcy Law From A Sociological Jurisprudence Perspective

Alfin Sulaiman (1), Siti Nurbaiti (2), Anna Maria Tri Anggraini (3)
(1) Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia,
(2) Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia,
(3) Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia

Abstract

Background. Indonesian bankruptcy law under Law Number 37 of 2004 is formally designed as a technical mechanism for collective debt settlement, yet its application operates within a socio-cultural context that perceives insolvency as a moral failure and social stigma. This condition creates a persistent gap between legal formalism and the “living law” of Indonesian society.


Purpose. This study aims to analyze how Indonesian bankruptcy law functions as an instrument of social engineering when examined through the perspective of sociological jurisprudence, particularly in balancing creditor rights, business continuity, and broader socio-economic stability.


Method. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials include bankruptcy legislation and relevant judicial decisions, while secondary materials consist of doctrinal writings on sociological jurisprudence and insolvency law. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through legal interpretation and deductive reasoning.


Results. The study finds that the suspension of debt payment mechanism contributes to the preservation of the social function of business entities by enabling courts to prioritize restructuring over liquidation, thereby supporting employment protection and macroeconomic stability. In practice, this is reflected in judicial tendencies to emphasize going concern considerations and consensual settlement during PKPU proceedings.


Conclusion. This study offers a novel contribution by systematically positioning bankruptcy law as a form of institutionalized social engineering, demonstrating that integrating sociological considerations into judicial interpretation and normative reform is essential for transforming bankruptcy law from a liquidation-centered mechanism into a constructive instrument for economic resilience and social justice.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Adekunle, I. (2026). Dual Role Executives and Corporate Membership of Emission Trading Schemes: The Role of Board Structure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 35(2), 2122–2142. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70265

Aggarwal, D. C. (2026). Creditor Rights and Legal Transaction Costs. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 23(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70020

Alfawzan, F. I. (2025). Control of Saudi Corporate Reorganisations: Critical Analysis from an Anglo-American Perspective. Arab Law Quarterly, (Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10188

Armour, J., & Cumming, D. (2008). Bankruptcy Law and Entrepreneurship. American Law and Economics Review, 10(2), 303–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahn008

Ayotte, K. (2026). Bankruptcy’s trilemma: A unifying framework. Journal of Legal Analysis, 18(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laaf015

Berkowitz, S. A., Seligman, H. K., & Choudhry, N. K. (2014). Treat or eat: Food insecurity, cost-related medication underuse, and unmet needs. The American Journal of Medicine, 127(4), 303-310.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.002

Berman, K. G. (2025). CONSIDER THIS: MAKE-WHOLE PREMIUMS AS UNMATURED INTEREST. Fordham Law Review, 93(5), 1757–1796.

Beyene, M. (2025). Clashing Statutes: Reconciling Ethiopia’s Automatic Stay under the Revised Commercial Code with Bank Foreclosure Rights. Mizan Law Review, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v19i2.3

Correction: Consumer default after the 2005 bankruptcy reform (The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization (2025) (ewae030) DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ewae030). (2025). Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 41(3), 1158–1159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaf014

Edelman, M. (2025). Catholic Dioceses, Legal Systems, and Corporate Accountability. Dalam Catholic Dioceses Legal Systems and Corporate Accountability (hlm. 197). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509982103

El-jabali, A. (2025). Cross-border Bankruptcy in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Challenges and Responsible Digital Solutions. Navigating Responsible Business Practices Through Ethical AI, (Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-3104-1.ch003

Fagetan, A. M. (2025). Corporate Insolvency Laws in Selected Jurisdictions: US, England, France, and Germany—A Comparative Perspective. Laws, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14020021

Halliday, T., & Carruthers, B. (2009). Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Stanford University Press.

Hampson, C. D. (2025). Bankruptcy Fiduciaries. Iowa Law Review, 110(4), 1701–1753.

Huang, A. Z. (2025). Bankruptcy Law’s doctrinal evolution: An empirical study. American Business Law Journal, 62(4), 289–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.70005

Iza, A. (2025). Borrowing constraints, financial frictions, misallocation and GDP per worker. Journal of Macroeconomics, 83(Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2024.103660

Jequier-Lehuedé, E. T. (2025). DERIVATIVE CONTRACTS, REPO TRANSACTIONS AND NETTING IN THE LIQUIDATION PROCEDURE, LAW NO. 20.720. THE BANKRUPTCY RULE AS A TOOL FOR STABILIZING THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM AND ITS (LACK OF) RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PURPOSES AND PRINCIPLES OF BANKRUPTCY. Revista Chilena De Derecho Privado, (46), 9–57. https://doi.org/10.32995/S0718-80722025937

Jiang, S. (2025). Creditor protection and asset-debt maturity mismatch: A quasi-natural experiment in China. Applied Economics, 57(52), 8674–8692. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2402093

Li, W. (2025). Consumer Bankruptcy, Mortgage Default, and Labor Supply. International Economic Review, 66(3), 1019–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12771

Liu, X. (2025). Creditor protection and government procurement contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 79(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101742

Liu, Y. (2025). Bankruptcy law enforcement and corporate digital transformation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Applied Economics, 57(39), 6044–6060. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2379509

Miao, M. (2025). Bankruptcy judicial reform and corporate fraud: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 103(Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104514

Miranda, H. S. M. D. (2025). Economic analysis and judicial recovery: A necessary methodological approach. Revista De Direito Economico E Socioambiental, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v16i3.32504

Riyanto, R. B. (2025). Clashing Legal Realities: A Comparative Analysis of Insolvency Tests in Australia and Indonesia’s Bankruptcy Law. Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.27327

Seitenov, K. K. (2025). Compliance Control, Economic Expertise and Foresight in Business Legal Risk Management. Kutafin Law Review, 12(2), 273–307. https://doi.org/10.17803/2713-0533.2025.2.32.273-307

Sierakowski, B. (2025). Costs of the enforcement authority and the obligation to transfer to the bankruptcy estate amounts obtained in suspended enforcement proceedings. Polski Proces Cywilny Polish Civil Procedure, 2025(1), 102–114.

Subagyono, B. S. A. (2025). Contemporary Islamic Economic Law on Legal Protection for Bankrupt Guarantors: Comparative Insights from Common Law and Asian Jurisdictions. Milrev Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1449–1470. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11897

Swain, D. L. (2025). CROSS-BORDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE LEGAL REGIME ON INSOLVENCY IN THE AVIATION SECTOR. Business Performance Review, 3(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.22495/bprv3i1p1

Tosato, A. (2025). DEBT TOKENS. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 173(4), 1103–1171. https://doi.org/10.58112/uplr.173-4.3

Tripathi, P. (2025). Creditor rights and investment sensitivity: Evidence from an emerging market. Managerial Finance, 51(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-04-2023-0219

Tripathi, P. (2026). Bankruptcy law and capital structure choices in economically vs. Financially distressed firms: Evidence from an emerging market. Managerial Finance, 52(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-02-2025-0078

Tsindeliani, I. (2025). Collection of Taxes from Ultimate Beneficiaries: Russian Regulatory Model. Accounting Economics and Law A Convivium, 15(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2020-0149

Upadhyay, R. K. (2025). Bankruptcy and Insolvency. International Encyclopedia of Business Management, (Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13701-3.00529-6

Velazquez, A. (2025). Bargaining for the Common Good in Bankruptcy. Labor Studies Journal, 50(4), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449X251324433

Wei, L. (2025). Does party organization construction improve chinese banks’ stability? Evidence from a new textual index. China Economic Review, 94(Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102541

Xiao, Z. (2025). Do suppliers value customer firms’ digital transformation? Evidence from trade credit provision. International Review of Financial Analysis, 99(Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103976

Yu, Y. (2025). Bankruptcy law reform and financing costs for small and medium enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 84(Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107794

Zhou, Y. (2025). Bankruptcy court establishment and corporate financial fraud. International Review of Economics and Finance, 100(Query date: 2026-02-20 22:32:16). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104108

Authors

Alfin Sulaiman
alfinsulaiman72@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Siti Nurbaiti
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Sulaiman, A., Nurbaiti, S., & Anggraini, A. M. T. (2026). Indonesian Bankruptcy Law From A Sociological Jurisprudence Perspective. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law, 4(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.70177/rjl.v4i1.3228

Article Details