PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: A TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT
Article Sidebar
-
Keywords: Payment for Ecosystem Services, sustainable forest management, forest conservation, livelihoods, governance.
Abstract
The rapid depletion of forest ecosystems worldwide has led to an increasing need for sustainable forest management practices. One promising approach to incentivize conservation efforts is the implementation of Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs. PES aims to financially reward individuals or communities who provide ecological services, such as maintaining forest cover, conserving biodiversity, and improving water quality. Despite growing interest in PES, its effectiveness as a tool for sustainable forest management remains an area of active research. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PES programs in promoting sustainable forest management and enhancing the livelihoods of local communities. Specifically, the research examines the impact of PES on forest conservation practices, economic benefits for participants, and the long-term sustainability of forest ecosystems. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining both qualitative and quantitative data. Surveys were conducted with 150 households involved in PES programs across three forest regions. In-depth interviews with local stakeholders, including forest managers, government officials, and community leaders, were also carried out. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to assess the outcomes of PES programs. The findings suggest that PES programs have led to increased forest conservation efforts, improved local livelihoods, and greater awareness of ecosystem services. However, challenges such as inadequate funding, lack of technical support, and limited participation of marginalized groups were identified as barriers to full program effectiveness. PES programs can be a viable tool for sustainable forest management, provided that they are properly funded, inclusive, and supported by strong governance frameworks. Long-term success will depend on overcoming existing challenges and ensuring equitable participation.
Full text article
References
Alerasoul, A., Ashourizadeh, S., & Materia, V. C. (2025). The soil-management interface: An interdisciplinary review bridging natural capital, ecosystem services, and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 536, 146796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146796
Alves, L., Mendes, C., & Rocha, T. (2024). The Impact of Decentralization on Forest Governance in Southeast Asia. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v1i4.1663
Berhanu, Y., Dalle, G., Sintayehu, D. W., Kelboro, G., Nigussie, A., & Gitima, G. (2025). Carbon Stock Dynamics in Sheka Forest Biosphere Reserve, Ethiopia: A 60-Year Trajectory (1990–2050) and Its Implications for Ecosystem Services and Conservation. Scientific African, e03104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03104
Bicudo da Silva, R. F., Altivo, F., Millington, J. D. A., Dou, Y., Viña, A., Ribeiro, M. C., Vieira, S. A., & Liu, J. (2025). Positive effects of an Atlantic Forest program of payment for ecosystem services on native vegetation and pasture quality. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 23(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2025.06.005
Bremer, L. L., Nelson, S., Jackson, S., Izquierdo-Tort, S., Lansing, D., Shapiro-Garza, E., Echavarría, M., Upton, C., Asquith, N., Isyaku, U., Asiyanbi, A., He, J., & Pascual, U. (2023). Embedding local values in Payments for Ecosystem Services for transformative change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 64, 101354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101354
Chizmar, S., Cushing, T., Baral, S., & Ruseva, T. (2025). How do landowners perceive and respond to incentives for sustainable forest management? A synthesis to inform discussions on programs for climate-smart forestry. Trees, Forests and People, 19, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100753
Damaševi?ius, R., & Maskeli?nas, R. (2025). An analytical approach to blockchain-driven identity management in sustainable forest supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics, 12, 100161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100161
de Mendonça, G. C., Abdo, M. T. V. N., da Costa, L. M., Costa, R. C. A., Pacheco, F. A. L., Ribeiro, M. C., Zakia, M. J. B., Borma, L. D. S., & Pissarra, T. C. T. (2025). Watershed’s spatial targeting: Enhancing payments for ecosystem services to scale up agroecosystem restoration through nature-based solutions. Ecosystem Services, 71, 101679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101679
Garcia, G., Mann, C., & Cremer, T. (2025). An integrated conflict analysis approach for the sustainable supply of Forest Ecosystem Services in Germany—The case of forest-based biofuel production. Forest Policy and Economics, 170, 103361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103361
Gorain, S., Dutta, S., Balo, S., Malakar, A., Roy Choudhury, M., & Das, S. (2025). Harnessing green wealth: A two-decade global assessment of forest carbon sequestration and credits and the economic implications of sustainable forest management practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 393, 126987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126987
Gupta, G., Kumar, R., Singh, K., Rawat, V., Lavania, P., Kumari, P., Rani, M., Dobriyal, M., Srivastav, M., & Kumar, P. (2026). Chapter 4—Forest resources: Sustainable exploitation and management. In P. Kumar, P. K. Srivastava, M. L. Khan, A. Arunachalam, P. S. Roy, & K. Kumar (Eds.), Advanced Geospatial and Ground Based Techniques in Forest Monitoring (pp. 85–109). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18949-4.00003-8
Hernández-Blanco, M., Costanza, R., & Moritsch, M. (2025). Payment for Ecosystem Services 2.0: The Natural Capital Trust of Costa Rica. Ecosystem Services, 76, 101787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101787
Hertegård, E., & Widmark, C. (2025). Policy integration of forest ecosystem services-Cases of Catalonia, Estonia, Grisons, and Hesse & Thuringia. Land Use Policy, 151, 107478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107478
Jackson, C. M., Durowoju, O. S., Adelabu, S. A., & Adeniyi, S. A. (2025). An assessment of Kenya’s forest policy and law on participatory forest management for sustainable forest management: Insights from Mt. Kenya Forest Reserve. Trees, Forests and People, 19, 100770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100770
Kassun, B. W., Kallio, M., Trømborg, E., & Rannestad, M. M. (2025). Land use and land cover change, trade-offs, and synergies between ecosystem services in a dry Afromontane Forest. Journal for Nature Conservation, 85, 126874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126874
Keerthika, A., Parthiban, K. T., Chavan, S. B., Uthappa, A. R., Gupta, D. K., Verma, A., Shukla, A. K., & Mehta, R. S. (2025). Integrating ecosystem services through sustainable land use approach in multifucntional agroforestry: The case of Tamil Nadu, Southern India. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 28, 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100998
Le, H. T. T., & Shinjo, H. (2025). Motivational indicators for local participation in forest protection under Vietnam’s payment for forest environmental services. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 28, 101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.101038
Leimona, B., Bingham, L. R., Jarungrattanapong, R., & Van Noordwijk, M. (2023). Auctions in payments for ecosystem services and the plural values of nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 64, 101334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101334
Malik, A., Ichsan Ali, M., Rasyid Jalil, A., Mannan, A., & Musyawarah, R. (2025). Promoting sustainable mangrove tourism through payments for ecosystem services: Insights from Tongke-Tongke Village, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Regional Sustainability, 6(2), 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2025.100213
Mandal, M., & Ramu, M. (2024). A Holistic Framework for Planning and Managing Tropical Forest Resources. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.55849/selvicoltura.v1i1.172
Maza-Maza, J., Rodríguez-Caballero, E., Rodríguez-Lozano, B., & Cantón, Y. (2025). Impact of deforestation on ecosystem functions of Ecuador’s tropical dry forest under different protection status. Trees, Forests and People, 22, 101032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101032
Mir, K., & Brouwer, R. (2025). Testing the effect of ecosystem service and land classification on global values of forested watershed ecosystem services. Forest Policy and Economics, 181, 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103667
Muhammad, S., Habiba, U., Raza, G., Bano, S. A., Shah, S., Sabir, M., Amin, M., Alam, S., Akhtar, A., & Hussain, M. (2023). Payment for ecosystem services (PES): A holistic tool for sustainable forest management-a case study from Pakistan. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 83, e246002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.246002
Nuñez Godoy, C. C., & Pienaar, E. F. (2023). Motivations for, and barriers to, landowner participation in Argentina’s payments for ecosystem services program. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(8), e12991. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12991
Rakuasa, H., Latue, P. C., & Pakniany, Y. (2024). Climate Change and its Impact on Asian Forest Landscapes: A Critical Review. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(1), 23–16. https://doi.org/10.55849/selvicoltura.v1i1.172
Ringier, S. U., Mitani, Y., Schweier, J., & Lindhjem, H. (2025). Enhancing engagement: A European meta-analysis of forest owner preferences in voluntary agreements for the provision of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 76, 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101772
Sanyal, K., & Dasgupta, S. (2025). How village communities perceive the relevance of forest ecosystem services: Insights from Himachal Pradesh, India. Forest Policy and Economics, 179, 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103618
Sedmák, R., Scheer, ?., Kúdela, P., Vencúrik, J., Modranský, J., Daniš, D., & Fabrika, M. (2025). Multicriteria optimization of ecosystem services as a base for participative forest management promoting recreation near tourist centers and cities. Trees, Forests and People, 21, 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100905
Segura-Millán, K., & Perez-Verdin, G. (2023). The effect of payments for ecosystem services on forest cover, land use, and capacity building in northern Mexico. Trees, Forests and People, 12, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2023.100387
Takahashi, H., Fujita, M., & Nishida, D. (2024). Biodiversity Hotspots and Conservation Priorities in Tropical Asia. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(5), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v1i5.1667
Truffer, O., Lieberherr, E., Van Ruymbeke, K., Chimisso, C., Rowe, T., Vranken, L., & Ohmura, T. (2025). Mapping the research of Forest ecosystem Services in Europe: A review. Forest Policy and Economics, 181, 103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103663
Wei, S., Xiang, Y., & Li, Z. (2024). Balancing Conservation and Development: A Policy Framework for Sustainable Forest Management. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(4), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v1i4.1665
Wineland, S. M., Rezapour, S., & Neeson, T. M. (2023). Small tradeoffs between social equity and conservation outcomes in a freshwater payment for ecosystem services scheme. Ecological Applications, 33(4), e2829. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2829
Zandebasiri, M., Shirmardi, H. A., Ataie Solout, K., Mosleh Ghahfarokhi, Z., Talebi, M., & Mokhtarpour, T. (2025). Valuation of ecosystem services in Iranian protected forests: An economic approach to achieve sustainable development. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101521
Zhao, X., He, J., Zhou, S., Huang, P., Pu, J., Wang, Y., & Feng, M. (2025). Spatial zoning for sustainable eucalyptus plantations: Optimizing land use via ecosystem service supply-demand matching. Trees, Forests and People, 21, 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100962
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Aom Thai, Nong Chai, Som Chai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
