Crossmark Policy

Applying the Crossmark icon is a commitment by Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur.

What is Crossmark?

Crossmark is a multi-publisher initiative from Crossref that provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae understands the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians alike, and strives to maintain this trust in its electronic archive. Clicking on the Crossmark icon informs the reader of the current status of the document and may also provide additional publication record information.

Cognitionis Civitatis et Politicae Content and Crossmark

Crossmark display is limited to current and future journal content, and to specific publication types as listed below.

Publication Types
Addendum — Published if authors have inadvertently omitted significant information during manuscript submission and wish to add this content to the article after publication.
Corrigendum — Published when authors realize that errors in the published article could affect the validity of the scientific content or its accuracy.
Erratum — Published only when mistakes are recognized in the published article that went unnoticed during editing and layout setting (e.g., in figures, tables), or in papers, preliminary notes, and similar content.
Correspondence — A letter to the editor, or a reply to such a letter.
Book Review — A review of a published book.
Removal — The abstract/text and the PDF are removed, and an explanation is provided for the removal.
Replacement — The article is retracted as with a standard retraction, with the difference that a link to the corrected, re-published article is placed on the PDF versions of the paper and on the retraction notice page.
Retraction — The abstract/text of the article is retracted. The PDF is retained with a watermark on every page to indicate that it has been retracted.

DOI: 10.70177/politicae/CrossmarkPolicy