The Role of Empathy in Reducing Prejudice: A Cross-Cultural Study in Diverse Elementary School Settings
Article Sidebar
-
Keywords: empathy, prejudice reduction, cross-cultural, elementary education, diversity.
Abstract
Prejudice is a pervasive issue in diverse societies, and addressing it at an early age can help reduce its long-term impact. This study explores the role of empathy in reducing prejudice among elementary school students in diverse cultural settings. The research aims to examine whether empathy training can effectively decrease prejudicial attitudes in students from different cultural backgrounds and whether such interventions are equally impactful across various cultural contexts. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining pre- and post-intervention surveys with in-depth interviews in a sample of 300 students from three culturally diverse elementary schools. The quantitative data, analyzed using paired t-tests and ANOVA, revealed a significant reduction in prejudicial attitudes among students who participated in empathy-building activities. The qualitative findings, derived from interviews with teachers and students, supported these results, suggesting that empathy training fostered greater understanding and respect for diversity. The study concludes that empathy plays a crucial role in reducing prejudice in young children and that culturally tailored empathy interventions are effective in diverse elementary school environments. This research emphasizes the importance of early interventions in promoting inclusivity and tolerance, offering practical insights for educators and policymakers in multicultural education.
Full text article
References
Berger, R., Brenick, A., Lawrence, S. E., Coco, L., & Abu-Raiya, H. (2018). Comparing the effectiveness and durability of contact- and skills-based prejudice reduction approaches. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 59, 46–53. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.002
Birtel, M. D., Di Bernardo, G. A. D., Hobson, H., Collins-Quirk, A., & Vezzali, L. (2024). Avoiding affect in intergroup relations: The roles of dispositional and intergroup empathy in the relationship between alexithymia and prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 54(2), 83–98. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13015
Birtel, M. D., Di Bernardo, G. A. D., Vezzali, L., Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Martin, R. (2024). Dispositional empathy and personality as predictors of contact quality: The mediating roles of contact self-efficacy and effort towards contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 102. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101986
Birtel, M. D., Vezzali, L., & Stathi, S. (2018). Extended contact and affective factors: A review and suggestions for future research. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 25(2), 213–238. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM25.2.4
Cachón Ramón, D., & Igartua, J.-J. (2016). Impact of the narrative formats on the behavior improvement in relation to the socially stigmatized groups: The effect of empathy and similarity in terms of social identity. In F. J. Garcia-Penalvo (Ed.), ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. (Vols. 02-04-November-2016, pp. 1197–1199). Association for Computing Machinery acmhelp@acm.org; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012430.3012669
Cadenas, G. A., Cisneros, J., Todd, N. R., & Spanierman, L. B. (2018). DREAMzone: Testing two vicarious contact interventions to improve attitudes toward undocumented immigrants. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(3), 295–308. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000055
Campbell, C., Andersen, L., Mutsikiwa, A., Madanhire, C., Skovdal, M., Nyamukapa, C., & Gregson, S. (2014). Children’s representations of school support for HIV-affected peers in rural Zimbabwe. BMC Public Health, 14(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-402
Charalampidou, P., & Psaltis, C. (2022). Inventing New Road Paths for the Contact Theory Through Contact With a Puppet (a “Syrian Refugee Child”) via a Teacher-Led Intervention in a Greek Primary School. Peace and Conflict, 28(3), 327–339. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000612
Chauhan, R., Kakkar, S., Singhal, R., & Negi, A. (2025). Neurodevelopmental Disabilities: Current Perspectives on Burden of Care and Stigma—A Comprehensive Review. In Health Psychology in Integr. Health Care (pp. 129–135). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003596806-20
Cheung, W.-Y., Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2017). Nostalgia proneness and reduced prejudice. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 89–97. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.045
Dovidio, J. F., Ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., Esses, V. M., Riek, B. M., & Pearson, A. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1537–1549. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271177
Fozdar, F. (2011). “I’ve never looked at someone and thought what colour they are”: Contact theory and interracial friendship in New Zealand. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 32(4), 383–405. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2011.584616
Gobiet, J. P. R., González, A. D. F., & Morales-Rodríguez, F. M. (2024). Exploring homophobia and its impacts: Psychological wellbeing, self-esteem, bullying and academic stress. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 17(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.32457/ejep.v17i2.2798
Guasp-Coll, M., Navarro, D., Lacomba-Trejo, L., Giménez-Espert, M. C., & Prado-Gascó, V. J. (2022). Emotional skills in adolescents’ attitudes towards diversity: Regression models vs qualitative comparative analysis models. Current Psychology, 41(12), 8718–8731. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01319-6
Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 154–159. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409025
Hogg, M. A. (2015). Constructive leadership across groups: How leaders can combat prejudice and conflict between subgroups. Advances in Group Processes, 32, 177–207. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-614520150000032007
Holbrook, C. (2018). Cues of violent intergroup conflict diminish perceptions of robotic personhood. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 8(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1145/3181674
Igartua, J.-J., & Cachón Ramón, D. (2023). Personal narratives to improve attitudes towards stigmatized immigrants: A parallel-serial mediation model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 26(1), 96–119. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211052511
Imperato, C., Keum, B. T., & Mancini, T. (2021). Does intercultural contact increase anti-racist behavior on social network sites? Social Sciences, 10(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060207
Jang, H., & Lee, J. (2025). Effective VR Intervention to Reduce Implicit Bias Towards People with Physical Disabilities: The Interplay Between Experience Design and Individual Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(5), 2342–2352. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3549532
Kuchenbrandt, D., Eyssel, F., & Seidel, S. K. (2013). Cooperation makes it happen: Imagined intergroup cooperation enhances the positive effects of imagined contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16(5), 635–647. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212470172
Lin, C., Li, L., Wan, D., Wu, Z., & Yan, Z. (2012). Empathy and avoidance in treating patients living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) among service providers in China. AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 24(11), 1341–1348. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2011.648602
Miranda, D., & Gaudreau, P. (2020). Music and cultural prejudice reduction: A review. Musicae Scientiae, 24(3), 299–312. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918802331
Pagotto, L., & Voci, A. (2013). Direct and mass-mediated contact: The role of different intergroup emotions. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20(4), 365–381. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.4.5
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediatorsy. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
Rösler, I. K., & Amodio, D. M. (2022). Neural Basis of Prejudice and Prejudice Reduction. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 7(12), 1200–1208. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.10.008
Sambanis, N., Simonson, M. D., & Yaylac?, ?. (2025). Once We Too Were Strangers: Can a Heritage of Displacement Be Leveraged to Build Support for Present-Day Refugees? Journal of Politics, 87(3), 1215–1220. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1086/732984
Stobie, C. (2022). Imagined Identity and Human Rights in the Post-pandemic World of Lauren Beukes’s Afterland. Journal of Literary Studies, 38(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/10417
Talumaa, B., Brown, A., Batterham, R. L., & Kalea, A. Z. (2022). Effective strategies in ending weight stigma in healthcare. Obesity Reviews, 23(10). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13494
Tropp, L. R., & Molina, L. E. (2012). Intergroup ProcessesFrom Prejudice to Positive Relations Between Groups. In The Oxf. Handb. Of Personal. And Soc. Psychol. Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.013.0022
Verzoni, A., & Saraiva de Macedo Lisboa, C. (2017). Discussion on prejudice and empathy in children and adolescents in situations of social vulnerability: Proposition of interventions. In Vulnerable Children and Youth in Brazil: Innovative Approaches from the Psychology of Soc. Development (pp. 89–101). Springer International Publishing; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65033-3_7
