THE ECONOMICS OF REDD+ (REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION): A POLICY ANALYSIS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) is a pivotal international climate change mitigation mechanism, with Indonesia being a key implementing country due to its vast tropical forests. Despite significant international investment, the economic viability and effectiveness of REDD+ in achieving its goals are contingent upon the design and implementation of national policies. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive economic policy analysis of REDD+ implementation in Indonesia, evaluating its efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and the equity of its benefit-sharing mechanisms. A policy analysis framework was employed, integrating economic principles with a review of national and sub-national REDD+ policies, regulations, and project implementation documents from 2010 to 2024. The analysis was supplemented by a meta-synthesis of financial reports from REDD+ pilot projects and existing academic literature to assess transaction costs, financial flows, and benefit distribution. The analysis reveals significant economic challenges. High transaction costs, coupled with unclear carbon tenure and property rights, have created substantial inefficiencies and deterred private sector investment. Furthermore, the absence of a consistent national carbon price has undermined the financial incentives for land-use change. Benefit-sharing mechanisms were often found to be ad-hoc, leading to inequitable outcomes that failed to adequately compensate local communities for their opportunity costs. For REDD+ to become an economically viable and effective climate mitigation strategy in Indonesia, significant policy reforms are imperative. Future policies must focus on reducing transaction costs, providing clear and secure carbon tenure, and establishing transparent, equitable, and efficient benefit-sharing mechanisms that reflect the true costs borne by local stakeholders.
Full text article
References
Acheampong, A., & Wang, Y. (2025). Carbon reduction initiatives, firm innovation and firm value. Economics Letters, 256. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112613
Adamolekun, G., Li, H., & Xu, B. (2025). Carbon markets and firms’ perceived climate regulatory risk. Journal of Environmental Management, 393. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127050
Arslan, A., Yener, S., & Akturan, A. (2025). The Dark Side of ESG Ratings: Future Challenges for Corporate Strategies. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(3), 78–85. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.26712
Aytekin, A. (2025). Determining the ideal integrated performance measurement approach for eco-entrepreneurship in manufacturing sectors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 528. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146758
Custódio, C., Mendes, D., & Metzger, D. (2025). The Impact of the Financial Education of Executives on the Financial Practices of Medium and Large Enterprises. Journal of Finance, 80(5), 2875–2920. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13476
Duque, M. A. N., Núñez, E. O., Tamayo, E. M. P., Mialon, M., Crosbie, E., & de la Rosa, C. P. T. (2025). “Favoring those who contributed to their political campaigns”: An analysis of the incentives received by the food industry in Colombia in the period of 2018—2020. Globalization and Health, 21(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01123-6
Gangi, F., Varrone, N., Mustilli, M., Daniele, L. M., & Coscia, M. (2025). Board Gender Diversity and Capital Adequacy: The Role of Environmental Responsibility in the Banking Industry. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 36(3), 537–561. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12235
Hajek, P., Sahut, J.-M., & Olej, V. (2025). Credit rating prediction using a fuzzy MCDM approach with criteria interactions and TOPSIS sorting. Annals of Operations Research, 353(1), 251–279. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06183-2
He, F., Duan, L., & Hao, J. (2025). The impact of managerial climate attention on corporate ESG performance—Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05439-x
He, P., & Zou, Y. (2025). Are senior management with academic experience more cautious? Empirical evidence from corporate risk-taking. Chinese Management Studies, 19(4), 1295–1320. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-08-2023-0393
Hellmann, A., Sood, S., & Melis, A. (2025). Seeing is believing? Visual, emotional, and ethical dimensions of corporate financial impression management. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 47. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2025.101066
Jin, Y., Feng, X., & Zeng, H. (2025). Does tax incentive improve corporate resilience?A quasi-natural experiment based on value-added tax retained rebate policy. International Economics, 183. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2025.100617
Katranc?, A., Kundakc?, N., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Financial performance evaluation of firms in BIST 100 index with ITARA and COBRA methods. Financial Innovation, 11(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00704-5
Khan, A. U. (2025). Political connection and firm’s financial performance; the role of corporate governance. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 25(6), 1443–1460. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2024-0223
Ma, K., Jiang, S., & Wu, D. (2025). The intensity of media supervision and adjustments in corporate financialization strategies: The catalytic role of artificial intelligence technology. Finance Research Letters, 84. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107788
Mao, K., Lu, H., & Wang, S. J. (2025). The effect of incidental name similarity on favoritism in the Chinese financial market. Scientific Reports, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97364-x
Nasution, R. A. R., Rakuasa, H., Turi, F., Hidayatullah, M., & Latue, P. C. (2024). Analysis of Average Land Surface Temperature of Java Island, Indonesia in 2024 using reduceRegions in Google Earth Engine. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v1i2.1182
Nguyen, T. C., Nguyen, T. V. H., Schinckus, C., & Chu, T. T. (2025). Excess liquidity and risk: How economic policy uncertainty shapes corporate decisions post-crisis? Finance Research Letters, 83. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107739
Paranita, E. S., Ramadian, A., Wijaya, E., Nursanti, T. D., & Judijanto, L. (2025). The Impact of ESG Factors on Investment Decisions: Exploring the Interplay between Sustainability Reporting, Corporate Governance, and Financial Performance. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1), 4522–4533. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6342
Qi, X. (2025). Confucian culture, financial geographic distance, and business management strategy. Finance Research Letters, 86. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108583
Rakuasa, H., Latue, P. C., & Pakniany, Y. (2024a). Climate Change and its Impact on Asian Forest Landscapes: A Critical Review. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(1), 23–16. https://doi.org/10.55849/selvicoltura.v1i1.172
Rakuasa, H., Latue, P. C., & Pakniany, Y. (2024b). The Role of Russian Federation Government Policy in Addressing the Impacts of Global Climate Change. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55849/selvicoltura.v1i1.172
Rakuasa, H., Latue, P., & Pakniany, Y. (2024c). A Geographic Perspective in the Context of Political Ecology for Understanding Strategic Environmental Assessment in Indonesia. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.55849/selvicoltura.v1i1.172
Reyes, M. C., Flores, J., & Fernandez, C. (2024). Community-Based Forest Management: Challenges and Opportunities in Tropical Asia. Selvicoltura Asean, 1(5), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.70177/jsa.v1i5.1668
Schiehll, E., Martins, H. C., & Lewellyn, K. B. (2025). Symbolic or substantive? How shareholder heterogeneity shapes the purpose of the corporation. Long Range Planning, 58(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2025.102582
Shen, C., & Wu, J. (2025). Research on credit risk of listed companies: A hybrid model based on TCN and DilateFormer. Scientific Reports, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86371-7
Shen, D., & He, G. (2025). Restricting insider trading through increasing managerial risk aversion – A behavioral mechanism. International Review of Financial Analysis, 106. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104555
Toksoz, T., Demirkan, S., Demirkan, I., & Mishra, B. K. (2025). CEO overconfidence across the firm lifecycle: Effects on accounting outcomes and stock market reactions. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 21(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100511
Triki, O., & Abid, F. (2025). Corporate full-scale hedging and pricing of high-risk growth investment option. Review of Derivatives Research, 28(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-025-09218-3
Wang, D., Hu, Y., & Li, Y. (2025). Cost uniqueness and financial statement comparability. Finance Research Letters, 85. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108099
Wang, L., Tian, G., & Chen, X. (2025). Corporate site visits disclosure and investment-q sensitivity. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 94. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102904
Wang, T., Xie, Z., Du, C., & Cheng, Z. (2025). Financial technology empowerment, investor attention, and corporate investment efficiency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 107. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104651
Wei, H. (2025). SMOTE algorithm optimization and application in corporate credit risk prediction with diversification strategy consideration. Scientific Reports, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09173-x
Yang, X., & Zheng, Y. (2025). Does managerial climate attention matter? Evidence on corporate default risk from China. Sustainable Futures, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100965
Yu, J., Qiu, Q., & Qiao, Y. (2025). Managerial decision horizon and corporate greenwashing: Evidence from China. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 34(4), 1662–1683. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12734
Zhang, S., Hu, K., & Wang, X. (2025). Optimal carbon emission path under uncertainty: Physical risks and transition risks. Energy Economics, 151. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108914
Zhao, X., Yu, Y., & Song, Z. (2025). The effect of CFO’s accounting firm experience on debt concentration. International Review of Economics and Finance, 104. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104637
Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., & Li, S. (2025). Green game among government, enterprises, and the public: A study on the dynamics of enterprise green transformation from the perspective of Tripartite evolution. Sustainable Futures, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100894
Zhou, J., & Feng, Y. (2025). Climate risk, environmental supervision, and corporate green innovation. International Review of Financial Analysis, 107. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104581
Zhu, J., Zhao, M., Zhang, T., & Li, R. (2025). The role of ESG score in forecasting China corporate green bond issuance: Evidence from tree-based learning models. Sustainable Futures, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101324
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Loso Judijanto, Wang Jun, Chen Mei

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.