Provoking Active Learning among Student Teachers in Distance Education through a Dialogical Online Tutorial Approach
Article Sidebar
November 17, 2025
April 29, 2026
-
Active Learning, Banking Concept of Education, Dialogue, Distance Education, Online Tutorial
Abstract
Background. Distance education environments often face challenges in fostering active learning because online interactions can easily become teacher-centered, leading students to act as passive recipients of information. A dialogical learning approach is considered a potential strategy to promote participation and reduce passive learning patterns in online tutorials.
Purpose. This study aims to analyze the use of a dialogical approach in provoking active learning among student teachers participating in online tutorials at Universitas Terbuka (UT).
Method. This research employed a qualitative case study design to explore the implementation of a dialogue-based learning approach in an online tutorial. The participants consisted of nine student teachers enrolled in the Early Childhood Education program, all of whom were practicing kindergarten teachers, along with one online tutor facilitating the tutorial. Data were collected through observations of online tutorial interactions and participants’ reflections on their learning experiences.
Results. The findings indicate that the dialogical approach successfully encouraged student teachers to become more active learners during the online tutorials. Through structured dialogue, participants were able to exchange ideas, share professional experiences, and collaboratively construct knowledge. The dialogical interaction also reduced the tendency toward the banking concept of education by fostering reciprocal communication between tutor and students.
Conclusion. The implementation of a dialogical learning approach in distance education can enhance student participation and support meaningful learning experiences. This approach provides an effective strategy for promoting active engagement among student teachers in online learning environments.
Full text article
References
Baggaley, J., & Belawati, T. (2009). Distance education technology in Asia. Routledge.
Beckett, K. (2018). John Dewey’s conception of education: Finding common ground with R. S. Peters and Paulo Freire. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(12), 1182–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1365705
Benny, A. (2014). Pengembangan program tutorial via media teknologi video conference dalam sistem pendidikan jarak jauh (SPJJ). Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, 15(1), 1–11.
Bento, R., Brownstein, B., Schuster, C., & Zacur, S. (2005). Fostering online student participation. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2(7), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v2i7.1813
Burnett, C. (2010). Technology and literacy in early childhood educational settings: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(3), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410372154
Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Instructional dialogue: Distance education students’ dialogic behaviour. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070601004368
Chandrawati, T. (2018). How online tutorial can help distance education students to be more active in their learning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 249, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.2991/secret-18.2018.24
Chandrawati, T., Andriyani, D., Puspitasari, S., & Budi, U. L. (2023). Dialogue as a way to engage early childhood education student teachers with their learning: A case study in Universitas Terbuka. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 785–798. https://conference.ut.ac.id/index.php/innodel-proceedings/article/view/2206/1013
Clark, L. B. (2018). Critical pedagogy in the university: Can a lecture be critical pedagogy? Policy Futures in Education, 16(8), 985–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210318787053
Collins, K., Groff, S., Mathena, C., & Kupczynski, L. (2018). Asynchronous video and the development of instructor social presence and student engagement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.522378
Darojat, O. (2016). Improving curriculum through blended learning pedagogy. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.72654
Darojat, O. (2018). How are the results of quality assurance programs used to inform practices at a distance higher education? Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.382730
Dennan, V. P. (2005). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education, 26(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
Ehiobuche, C., Tu, H., & Justus, B. (2012). Dialogue as a tool for teaching and learning of entrepreneurship. In A. Mondal (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 300–309). ASBBS.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed., M. B. Ramos, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2007). A community of inquiry framework for online learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 77–88). Routledge.
Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005). Dialogue: A theoretical framework for distance education instructional systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00448.x
Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., & Tuvi-Arad, I. (2004). Use of instructional dialogue by university students in a distance education chemistry course. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 1–19. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/102
Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Holmberg, B. (2007). A theory of teaching-learning conversations. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed., pp. 69–74). Routledge.
Lane, A. B. (2018). If it’s so good, why not make them do it? Why true dialogue cannot be mandated. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.001
Lee, K., & Brett, C. (2015). Dialogic understanding of teachers’ online transformative learning: A qualitative case study of teacher discussions in a graduate-level online course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.001
Levine, A., & Sun, J. C. (2002). Barriers to distance education. American Council on Education.
Lin, Z., & Palmer, J. C. (2016). A critical review of sociological dialogue between China and the West. Journal of Dialogue Studies, 4(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397200916669698
Moore, M. G. (2006). Editorial: Dialogue. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(3), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2003_1
Moore, M. G. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of distance education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.
Morgan, A. (1993). Improving your students’ learning: Reflections on the experience of study. Kogan Page.
Omito, O. (2016). Evaluating learners’ ability to use technology in distance education: The case of the external degree programme of the University of Nairobi. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 12(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.18587
Scott, C. F. (2011). Becoming dialogue: Martin Buber’s concept of turning to the other as educational praxis (Doctoral dissertation).
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2009). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (4th ed.). Pearson.
Suryadi, A. (2007). Pemanfaatan ICT dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, 8(1), 83–98.
Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults (Rev. ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Watts, L. K. (2010). The role of dialogue in distance education: A qualitative study (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Titi Chandrawati, David Kaufman, Charles Scott
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
