The Impact of Ride-Hailing Platforms on the Livelihoods and Social Welfare of Gig Economy Workers in Indonesia
Downloads
The rise of ride-hailing platforms has significantly transformed the labor market in Indonesia, especially within the gig economy. As a rapidly growing sector, these platforms offer flexible work opportunities, attracting millions of workers. However, the impact of ride-hailing on the livelihoods and social welfare of gig economy workers remains understudied. This research aims to explore how ride-hailing platforms influence the income stability, social security, and overall well-being of gig workers in Indonesia.
A mixed-methods approach was used for this study, combining surveys and in-depth interviews with 300 gig workers from major cities like Jakarta, Surabaya, and Yogyakarta. The survey collected quantitative data on income patterns, job satisfaction, and access to social benefits, while qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into the social and psychological effects of gig work.
The findings indicate that while ride-hailing platforms offer a source of income and flexible working hours, they also expose workers to income instability, lack of social protection, and job insecurity. Only 15% of workers reported having access to formal social security benefits, with many relying on informal networks for support. Additionally, mental health concerns were prevalent due to the unpredictable nature of gig work and the absence of a supportive work environment.
The study concludes that while ride-hailing platforms offer significant economic opportunities, there is an urgent need for policy reforms that address workers' rights, social security, and job security to ensure the sustainability of their livelihoods and well-being.
Abuselidze, G. (2021). Pandeconomic crisis and its impact on small open economies: A case study of COVID-19. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1258(Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25), 718–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57450-5_61
Anggono, B. D. (2025). Interrogating the Legal Foundations of Digital Transformation: Balancing Economic Growth and Social Welfare in the Era of Disruption. Volksgeist Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 8(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i1.12211
Au-Yeung, T. C. (2025a). Contractual restriction, business model, and institutional support: The multilevel configuration of platform-mediated care work and care precarity in Hong Kong. Competition and Change, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294251350352
Au-Yeung, T. C. (2025b). The gig economy, platform work, and social policy: Food delivery workers’ occupational welfare dilemma in Hong Kong. Journal of Social Policy, 54(2), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000673
Bae, J. (2025). The Safety Net and the Gig Economy: Policy Attitudes and Political Participation. Perspectives on Politics, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592725103411
Balandi, G. G. (2022). Solidarity: Different Issues in a Community Perspective. Inscribing Solidarity Debates in Labor Law and Beyond, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009170260.004
Beckmann, F. (2022). From loopholes to deinstitutionalization: The platform economy and the undermining of labor and social security institutions. Partecipazione E Conflitto, 15(3), 800–826. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v15i3p800
Casey, A. A. (2025). History repeats itself, first as BPR, second as generative AI. AI and Society, 40(7), 5755–5757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02262-5
Chen, L. (2025). Bonus Competition in the Gig Economy. Production and Operations Management, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478251389408
Clemons, R. S. (2020). PUBLIC POLICY PRAXIS: A CASE APPROACH FOR U NDERSTANDING POLICY AND ANALYSIS, FOURTH EDITION. Dalam Public Policy Praxis A Case Approach for Understanding Policy and Analysis Fourth Edition (hlm. 330). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367444495
Divya, S. (2024). An Evaluation of Social Protection Measures for Gig Workers—A Pilot Study. Organization Purpose and Values Integrating Diversity Equity and Inclusion, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 143–165. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003501374-10
Doorn, N. van. (2023). Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention. Work Employment and Society, 37(4), 1099–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221096581
Elliott, H. (2022). What Should a Job Look Like? People Before Markets an Alternative Casebook, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009165846.021
Gunawan, L. (2024). Exploring Impacts of Gojek Application as a Sharing Economy Tool on Indonesian Economics and Society: Systematic Literature Review Approach. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(4), 1390–1405. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3670
Heng, X. (2025). The Rise of Riders: Digital Platforms, Targeted Matching, and Job Creation. China Economist, 20(2), 96–132. https://doi.org/10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2025.03.05
Huws, U. (2020). Reinventing the welfare state: Digital platforms and public policies. Dalam Reinventing the Welfare State Digital Platforms and Public Policies (hlm. 209). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108185474&origin=inward
Ivancheva, M. P. (2025). Correction to: The double-bind of freedom and economic security: Venezuelan “middle class” migrants in Argentina’s platform economy (Dialectical Anthropology, (2025), 10.1007/s10624-024-09734-y). Dialectical Anthropology, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-025-09784-w
Kougiannou, N. K. (2025). Gig-dependent or just gigging? Examining the gig economy’s structural characteristics on food delivery couriers. Employee Relations, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2024-0525
Laskin, A. V. (2024). INTRODUCTION. Public Relations and Strategic Communication in 2050 Trends Shaping the Future of the Profession, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003426653-1
Liu, D. (2025). The gig treadmill: Urban-rural exclusion and the overwork of China’s couriers. Cities, 167(Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106358
Makhtar, M. (2024). Exploring legal protections for platform workers in malaysia: A human rights-based perspective. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v11n2.a2
Meacham, H. (2024). Flexibility and the disadvantaged, disabled and precarious worker. Work Employment and Flexibility Innovation Technology and the Changing World of Work, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 204–221. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035309368.00021
Öçal, M. (2025). Informal work and the protection of social rights: The gray areas of employment. Dalam Informal Work and the Protection of Social Rights the Gray Areas of Employment (hlm. 517). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9198-3
O’Donnell, A. (2019). Inventing Unemployment: Regulating Joblessness in Twentieth-Century Australia. Dalam Inventing Unemployment Regulating Joblessness in Twentieth Century Australia (hlm. 184). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128450595&origin=inward
Porte, C. de la. (2023). Going Nordic—Can the Nordic model tackle grand challenges and be a beacon to follow? Regulation and Governance, 17(3), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12494
Silva, B. C. (2022). Entrepreneurship and the gig economy: A bibliometric analysis. Cuadernos De Gestion, 22(2), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.211580am
Soyocak, S. (2025). New Approaches and Innovations in Public Personnel Management: The Transformation of Work and Employment Forms From a Historical Perspective. New Approaches and Innovations in Public Personnel Management, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-2215-5.ch001
Wynn, M. (2019). Flexicurity outside the employment relationship? Re-engineering social security for the new economy. Social Security Outside the Realm of the Employment Contract Informal Work and Employee Like Workers, Query date: 2025-12-26 14:23:25, 30–57. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788113403.00008
Yang, Y. (2025). The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion Pensions, Labor Informalization, and Labor Mobility in China. Dalam Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion Pensions Labor Informalization and Labor Mobility in China (hlm. 202). https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197823514.001.0001
Zhang, W. (2022). Impact of capacity flexibility on service product line design. Annals of Operations Research, 312(2), 1095–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04624-4
Zhao, B. (2023). Optimal delivery time and subsidy for IT-enabled food delivery platforms considering negative externality and social welfare. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 123(5), 1336–1358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2022-0554
Copyright (c) 2025 Ratu Agung Bagus Ngurah Putra, Nandar Hlaing, Sevda Kara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















