Who Owns Childbirth? A Philosophical Inquiry into Autonomy, Medicalization, and Midwifery-Led Care
Indonesia 
Singapore Singapore 
Abstract
Background. Childbirth increasingly takes place within highly medicalized healthcare systems in which clinical expertise, institutional protocols, and technological surveillance may conflict with bodily autonomy and meaningful maternal choice. This tension raises important ethical questions concerning who should hold decision-making authority during childbirth and how professional responsibility can be balanced with the autonomy of birthing women.
Purpose. This study aimed to examine how authority over childbirth should be ethically distributed among birthing women, healthcare professionals, and maternity institutions, with particular attention to the role of midwifery-led care in reconciling maternal autonomy with clinical safety.
Method. A qualitative philosophical inquiry was conducted using conceptual clarification, normative argument analysis, critical comparison, and representative ethical case examination. The analysis drew on literature from bioethics, feminist philosophy, philosophy of medicine, and maternity care to evaluate competing claims concerning bodily autonomy, professional expertise, institutional authority, risk, and informed decision-making.
Results. The analysis indicates that birthing women retain primary moral authority over their bodies, values, and healthcare choices, while healthcare professionals possess legitimate but bounded epistemic and fiduciary authority derived from professional expertise and duties of care. Medicalization becomes ethically problematic when clinical recommendations, institutional routines, or risk-based discourse override competent maternal choices without proportionate ethical or clinical justification.
Conclusion. Childbirth is best governed through a model of shared but asymmetrical authority in which clinical expertise contributes substantially to protecting maternal and neonatal health without displacing the bodily sovereignty, dignity, informed refusal, and moral agency of the person giving birth. Midwifery-led care offers an ethically valuable framework for achieving this balance by integrating professional responsibility with relational and autonomy-respecting maternity care
Full text article
References
Albert, S. M. (1992). Psychometric investigation of a belief system: Caregiving to the chronically ill parent. Social Science & Medicine, 35(5), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90008-E
Brady, S., Bogossian, F., & Gibbons, K. S. (2023). Achieving international consensus on the concept of woman-centred care: A Delphi study. Special Issue: Early Labour, 36(6), e631–e640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.06.001
Brady, S., Gibbons, K. S., & Bogossian, F. (2024). Defining woman-centred care: A concept analysis. Midwifery, 131, 103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.103954
Catling, C. J., Reid, F., & Hunter, B. (2017). Australian midwives’ experiences of their workplace culture. Women and Birth, 30(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.10.001
Chrisley, R. (2008). Philosophical foundations of artificial consciousness. Artificial Consciousness, 44(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.011
Crowther, S., & Lau, A. (2019). Migrant Polish women overcoming communication challenges in Scottish maternity services: A qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery, 72, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.02.004
Davis, J. A. P. (2010). Midwives and Normalcy in Childbirth: A Phenomenologic Concept Development Study. Special Continuing Education Issue, 55(3), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.12.007
Egenberg, S., Skogheim, G., Tangerud, M., Sluijs, A.-M., Slootweg, Y. M., Elvemo, H., Barabara, M., & Lundgren, I. (2025). Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Midwifery, 140, 104192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104192
Flesch, H. (2007). Silent voices: Women, complementary medicine, and the co-optation of change. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 13(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2007.03.005
George, E. K., Dominique, S., Irie, W., & Edmonds, J. K. (2024). “It’s my Home away from Home:” A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring decision-making experiences of choosing a freestanding birth centre for perinatal care. Midwifery, 139, 104164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104164
Hood, L., Fenwick, J., & Butt, J. (2010). A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives’ experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice. Midwifery, 26(3), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008
Ingvarsson, S., Schildmeijer, K., & Oscarsson, M. (2020). Swedish midwives’ experiences and views of amniotomy: An interview study. Midwifery, 91, 102840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102840
Kuipers, Y. J., Bleijenbergh, R., Thaels, E., & Mestdagh, E. (2024). A multi-actor perspective of humanised midwifery care excellence: An exploratory survey. Women’s Studies International Forum, 106, 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102956
Leavy, F., & Leggett, H. (2022). Midwives’ experiences of working in team continuity of carer models: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Midwifery, 112, 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103412
Madeley, A.-M., Earle, S., & O’Dell, L. (2026). Reproductive identity expression, reinforcement and defence: A constructivist grounded theory of non?normative pregnancy and childbirth decisions in the UK. Midwifery, 160, 104873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2026.104873
Maier, B. (2014). Is the narrow concept of individual autonomy compatible with or in conflict with Evidence-based Medicine in obstetric practice?: A philosophical critique on the misapplication of the value concept “autonomy.” Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.woman.2014.10.003
Mallick, S. (2016). Challenges of mainstreaming: Ayurvedic practice in Delhi Government health institutions. Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine, 7(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2015.10.001
Maqbool, B., & Herold, S. (2024). Potential effectiveness and efficiency issues in usability evaluation within digital health: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 208, 111881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111881
Maude, R. M., & Foureur, M. J. (2007). It’s beyond water: Stories of women’s experience of using water for labour and birth. Women and Birth, 20(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2006.10.005
May, A. E., & Elton, C. D. (1998). 6 The effects of pain and its management on mother and fetus. Baillière’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 12(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3552(98)80076-X
Newsome, L., Sheridan, A., Lawson, A., Charry, S., & Field, S. (2024). The “dreaded” daughter-in-law in Australian farm business succession. Journal of Rural Studies, 109, 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103324
Norris, S., & Murphy, F. (2020). A community of practice in a midwifery led unit. How the culture and environment shape the learning experience of student midwives. Midwifery, 86, 102685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102685
OBoyle, C. (2013). ‘Just waiting to be hauled over the coals’: Home birth midwifery in Ireland. Midwifery, 29(8), 988–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.010
O’Malley-Keighran, M. P., & Lohan, G. (2016). Encourages and guides, or diagnoses and monitors: Woman centred-ness in the discourse of professional midwifery bodies. Midwifery, 43, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.007
Palimbo, A., Salmah, A. U., Amiruddin, R., & Syam, A. (2021). An overview of the implementation of the continuity of care model in maternal health services: A literature review. The 3rd International Nursing and Health Sciences Students and Health Care Professionals Conference (INHSP), 35, S388–S392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.058
Permezel, J., Arnold, A. S. C., Thomas, J., Maepioh, A. L., Brown, R., Hafford-Letchfield, T., Skouteris, H., Hatzikiriakidis, K., & McNair, R. P. (2023). Experiences in the delivery of preconception and pregnancy care for LGBTIQA+ people: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient and healthcare provider perspectives. Midwifery, 123, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103712
Prince, I. (2025). On “minor” adverse effects: Some misconceptions affecting the handling of epistemic risks in medical research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 114, 102080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.102080
Reiger, K. (1999). ‘Sort of part of the women’s movement. But different’: Mothers’ organisations and australian feminism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(6), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00069-2
Rigg, E., Schmied, V., Peters, K., & Dahlen, H. (2015). Not addressing the root cause: An analysis of submissions made to the South Australian Government on a Proposal to Protect Midwifery Practice. Women and Birth, 28(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2014.12.005
Sahrul, Widhi Nirwansyah, A., Demirdag, S., & Daulai, A. F. (2024). Batu Qulhu—The stone of death: Harmonizing traditional funerals in the Mandailing community of North Sumatra. Heliyon, 10(13), e33363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33363
Sakala, C. (1988). Content of care by independent midwives: Assistance with pain in labor and birth. Social Science & Medicine, 26(11), 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90190-6
Tarlazzi, E., Sacco, N., Branchini, L., Simonazzi, G., & Parma, D. (2025). Midwives’ perspectives on exploring emotional well-being during prenatal and postnatal care in the Italian contest: A qualitative study (the BEN_EM_OS study). Midwifery, 149, 104572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2025.104572
Thomas, B. G., Quant, V. M., & Cooke, P. (1998). The development of a problem-based curriculum in midwifery. Midwifery, 14(4), 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90099-7
Timmenga, F., & van der Zande, I. (2026). Evaluating and diversifying philosophy education. Learning and Instruction, 104, 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102369
Varslev-Pedersen, C. (2022). Mothers and Melancholia: Sacrifice in Søren Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, 8(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10051
Zhang, J., Haycock-Stuart, E., Mander, R., & Hamilton, L. (2015). Navigating the self in maternity care: How Chinese midwives work on their professional identity in hospital setting. Midwifery, 31(3), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.11.013
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Noorhani Dyani Laksmi, Jaden Tan , Isabelle Ng
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.