The Bioethics of Reproductive Rights: Historical Continuity and Philosophical Challenges in Contemporary Midwifery Policy-Making
Tonga Tonga Tonga 
Abstract
Background. Reproductive rights are central to ethical midwifery policy, yet contemporary commitments to autonomy continue to coexist with historical patterns of medical authority, maternal obligation, and unequal access to reproductive and maternity services. These tensions raise questions about whether formally recognized rights can be meaningfully exercised across different institutional and social contexts.
Purpose. This study aimed to examine historical continuities and philosophical tensions in reproductive-rights policy across five jurisdictions, with particular attention to autonomy, clinical responsibility, fetal interests, equitable access, and the regulatory position of midwifery.
Method. A qualitative historical-comparative design integrated normative bioethical inquiry with analysis of 214 historical and contemporary documents and semistructured interviews with 44 policymakers, midwifery leaders, bioethicists, advocates, regulators, legal experts, and service-user representatives. Genealogical analysis, thematic policy analysis, cross-case comparison, and wide reflective equilibrium were used to interpret the data and evaluate normative tensions across jurisdictions.
Results. The analysis generated five themes: institutionally conditioned autonomy, continuity through maternal-responsibility discourse, fetal interests as an ethical amplifier, formal rights without equitable access, and midwifery as both mediator and regulated agent. Contemporary policies strengthened consent, dignity, and bodily autonomy; however, institutional definitions of risk and responsible choice continued to shape available reproductive options.
Conclusion. Ethical midwifery policy should integrate bodily autonomy, relational support, clinical responsibility, historical awareness, and distributive justice. Reproductive safeguards should be evidence-based, proportionate, transparent, and non-discriminatory while ensuring continuity of care following informed refusal.
Full text article
References
Agopiantz, M., Dap, M., Martin, E., Meyer, L., Urwicz, A., Mougel, R., & Malmanche, H. (2023). Assisted reproductive technology in France: The reproductive rights of LGBT people. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 52(10), 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102690
AlJahsh, M. A. I. (2024). Science and Islamic ethics: Navigating artificial womb technology through Quranic principles. Heliyon, 10(17), e36793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36793
Ayyappan, S., Bhargava, D. C., Meshram, V. P., Jadav, D., Shekhawat, R. S., & Kanchan, T. (2025). Uterine transplantation: Ethical and legal challenges. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101185
Balistreri, M., & Umbrello, S. (2022). Should the colonisation of space be based on reproduction? Critical considerations on the choice of having a child in space. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100040
Brisson, J. (2025). Parental paternalism as an equity issue: A case study of parental influence on adolescents’ reproductive health in Medellín, Colombia. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101108
Brisson, J., Ravitsky, V., & Williams-Jones, B. (2022). Colombian adolescents’ preferences for independently accessing sexual and reproductive health services: A cross-sectional and bioethics analysis. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 32, 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100698
Brotherton, M. (2024). The Malleable Scarcity of Oral Contraceptive Pills. The Open Public Health Journal, 17. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118749445307431240709054621
Buchbinder, M., Arora, K. S., McKetchnie, S. M., & Sabbath, E. L. (2025). Medical uncertainty in the shadow of Dobbs: Treating obstetric complications in a new reproductive frontier. Social Science & Medicine, 369, 117856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117856
Buckey, T. M., Feldman, S. F., & Apter, A. J. (2024). An Ethical Framework for Allergy and Immunology. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 12(5), 1153–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.018
Byk, C. (2025). Fundamental principles of French bioethics—Between myth and reality. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101078
Casas-Becerra, L., Ramm, A., Pérez, B., Kaune, H., Carrasco-Portiño, M., Montero, A., Bustos-Ibarra, C., Castro-Arias, H., López-Labarca, C., & Reyes-Torres, L. (2026). Perceptions of Abortion and Sexual and Reproductive Health in Chilean Medical and Midwifery Education: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols, 15. https://doi.org/10.2196/81427
Davidson, H. R., Jamal, L., Mueller, R., Similuk, M., & Owczarzak, J. (2024). Renegotiation, uncertainty, imagination: Assemblage perspectives on reproductive and family planning with an Inborn Error of immunity. Social Science & Medicine, 360, 117303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117303
Desy, A., & Marre, D. (2024). The reproductive journeys of French women over 40 seeking assisted reproductive technology treatments in Spain. Social Science & Medicine, 351, 116951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116951
Durán del Campo, P., Solano Iturri, G., Alonso Ortiz, B., Bertran Muñoz, J., Bravo Blanco, A. M., Briongos Figuero, L., Carrera García, C., Chacón Moreno, A. D., Blanco Portillo, A., & Galván-Román, J. M. (2026). Current situation and role of internists in healthcare ethics committees in Spain. PANACEAS study. Revista Clínica Española (English Edition), 226(3), 502483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rceng.2026.502483
Farooq, A. (2026). Faith and culture in neuroethics: Implications for ethical communication. Dalam K. Bassil & J. L. Boyd (Ed.), Developments in Neuroethics and Bioethics (Vol. 9, hlm. 85–101). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.dnb.2026.02.003
Gaggiotti, H., & Gasparri, S. (2026). Egg freezing as an employment benefit? Gender, career, and reproductive health in neoliberal academia. Gender in Management, 41(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-10-2024-0547
Gallagher, S., Attinger, S., Sassano, A., Sutton, E., Kerridge, I., Newson, A., Farsides, B., Hammarberg, K., Hart, R., Jackson, E., Ledger, W., Mayes, C., Mills, C., Norcross, S., Norman, R. J., Rombauts, L., Waldby, C., Yazdani, A., & Lipworth, W. (2024). Medicine in the marketplace: Clinician and patient views on commercial influences on assisted reproductive technology. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 48(6), 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103850
Gallagher, S., Kerridge, I., Newson, A., Attinger, S., Norman, R. J., & Lipworth, W. (2024). Moral justification for the use of ‘add-ons’ in assisted reproductive technology: Experts’ views and experiences. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 48(2), 103637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103637
Gao, J., Idris, M. A., Gallegos, G. A., Griffin, B. C., Munroe, S. V., & Windett, J. H. (2025). Diffusion and division: A spatial analysis of surrogacy policy determinants in the United States. SSM - Population Health, 32, 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101876
Gryparis, I., Dagla, M., Gourounti, K., Jotautis, V., & Sarantaki, A. (2026). Knowledge and ethical attitudes toward preimplantation genetic testing among ART patients in Greece: A cross-sectional bioethical analysis. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 34, 101308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2026.101308
Guérin, J.-F. (2025). Artificial reproductive technologies (ART), a reproductive physician’s standpoint. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101062
Hall, H. L. (2025). “This is the first time somebody has asked me …“: How can actors realize the dimensions of contraceptive autonomy for adolescent migrant girls? A case study of Venezuelan migrants in Colombia. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 8, 100621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100621
Hinton, L., McNiven, A., White, A., Locock, L., Petrou, S., Rivero-Arias, O., & Boardman, F. (2026). Mapping the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 9, 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100683
Hoarau, E., Latypova, X., Jourdain, M., & Isidor, B. (2022). Challenges of preconception genetic testing in France: A qualitative study. European Journal of Medical Genetics, 65(11), 104606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2022.104606
Hukku, S., Wynn, L. L., & Foster, A. M. (2025). “If somebody wants an abortion, nobody should override their decision”: Modern Canadian perspectives on abortion in relation to artificial womb technology. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 7, 100529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100529
Jeffries Hein, R., Le Goff, A., & Landecker, H. L. (2025). Making and disposing of life’s ‘starting materials’: A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis. Social Science & Medicine, 379, 118146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118146
Kingsley, J., Andraka-Christou, B., Shah, S. K., Spicer, P., Newman, S., & Ossorio, P. N. (2024). Navigating ethical and legal challenges in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study: Lessons learned from the ethics, law, policy working group. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 70, 101460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101460
Kolianchuk, Y., Prodanchuk, M., & Jaksch, A. (2023). Combined reproductive and developmental toxicity study of pesticide abamectin on male and female Wistar Hannover rats. Reproductive Toxicology, 122, 108487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108487
Kooli, C. (2025). Navigating the legal vacuum: An ethical analysis of brain death, fetal personhood, and maternal autonomy in the post-roe era: Lessons from Smith v. Georgia. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101187
Kumar, N., Gangane, N., Mohapatra, I., Rukadikar, C., Sharmila, V., Pushpalatha, K., Eerike, M., Santhoshi, G., Samantaray, S. R., Seth, S., Trigunait, P., Reddy, N. J., Patel, S., Rani, S., Mishra, R., & Negi, K. (2024). Effect of COVID-19 Vaccination on Menstrual Cycle Patterns of Reproductive-age Women: A Multi-centric Observational Study. Current Drug Research Reviews, 16(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.2174/2589977515666230608140606
Labrosse, J., & Grynberg, M. (2022). Fertility of tomorrow: Are there any restrictions left? 64th International Meeting of Clinical Endocrinology - Henri-Pierre Klotz: HORMONES & FERTILITY, 83(3), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2022.04.011
Latortue-Albino, P., Delgado, S., Perkins, R., Yarrington, C., & Mehta, P. (2023). Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic. Women’s Health Issues, 33(4), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005
Le Bris, A., Decaux Ferré, N., & Ravel, C. (2026). What are the ethical considerations when supporting single women undergoing medically assisted reproduction (MAR)? Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 34, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101229
Lherbet, M. (2026). Gamete Selection in Gay Male Surrogacy: Procreative Labor beyond Gestation. Social Science & Medicine, 119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119679
Martínez, A. C., Aristizábal Castrillón, P., Lopez Erazo, L. J., Montoya Villegas, M., Tamayo, L. A., Montagut Ascanio, M., Borda, J. P., & Lasso, E. F. (2026). Design and validation of a bioethical assessment instrument for public health policies involving behavioral change: A mixed-methods study. Public Health in Practice, 11, 100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2026.100742
McCauley, E. J., & Johnson, E. R. (2026). Salience and context of incarceration history disclosure in sexual and reproductive health service delivery. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 9, 100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2026.100784
McKay, F., Treanor, D., & Hallowell, N. (2023). Inalienable data: Ethical imaginaries of de-identified health data ownership. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 4, 100321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100321
Moniz, M. H., Spector-Bagdady, K., Perritt, J. B., Heisler, M., Loder, C. M., Wetmore, M. K., & Harris, L. H. (2022). Balancing enhanced contraceptive access with risk of reproductive injustice: A United States comparative case study. Contraception, 113, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.004
Mumford, K., Hendriks, S., Miner, S., Huelsnitz, C. O., Wakim, P., & Berkman, B. E. (2024). Factors affecting couples’ decision making about expanded prenatal cell-free DNA screening. Genetics in Medicine Open, 2, 101890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101890
Natoli, E. (2024). The intrinsic moral value of individuals: A bioethical approach to domestic cats and damaged species. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 271, 106175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106175
Offer-Stark, I. (2023). Designing Medical law in a Multicultural Society: The case of Israeli end-of-life laws. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 28, 100907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2023.100907
O’Rourke, A., Vella, K., & de Jonge, A. (2023). Employer funded egg freezing: An advance for women in the workplace or a return to the unencumbered employee? Women’s Studies International Forum, 98, 102698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102698
Owen, A., Meredith, S., & Stoll, K. (2025). Prenatal genetic testing and disability rights: Addressing disability bias in practice. Dalam R. M. Hodapp & D. J. Fidler (Ed.), International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities (Vol. 69, hlm. 79–116). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irrdd.2025.09.004
Pulin, G., Bellacicco, R., Paladini, E., Pititto, F., & Marrone, M. (2025). Medico-legal aspects of male ritual circumcision in Europe. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101081
Qasim, N. H., Zhumagaliuly, A., Khozhamkul, R., & Rahim, F. (2024). The role of zygotic genome activation in genetic?related reproductive medicine: Technological perspective, religious and bioethical concerns, challenges and benefits. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 22(1), 100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2023.100340
Rial-Sebbag, E. (2025). The human body and the body elements—Conditions for their use in genetics under the French bioethics law and beyond. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 33, 101026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2024.101026
Szocik, K., & Abylkasymova, R. (2025). The bioethics of biomodification for the future of space exploration: Evaluating insights from feminist and non-feminist approaches. Futures, 174, 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103694
Wang, P. (2025). Critically analyzing the overturning of Roe v. Wade: What is wrong with Dobbs v. Jackson and how it can provide implications for democratic education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101669
Yao, H., Yang, J., & Lo, I. P. Y. (2023). Lesbian couples’ childbearing experiences using assisted reproductive technology: A netnography study. Midwifery, 121, 103656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103656
Zegers-Hochschild, F., Crosby, J. A., Musri, C., Borges de Souza, M. do C., Martinez, A. G., Amaral Silva, A., Mojarra, J. M., Masoli, D., & Posada, N. (2022). Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: The Latin American Registry, 2019. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 45(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.026
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Moana Siaosi, Lepa Palu , Tili Latu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.