Vocational Students’ Perceptions of Integrated Critical Reading Strategies in Business English Texts
Abstract
Background: Vocational EFL students often understand explicit information in workplace texts but struggle to infer implicit meanings, evaluate arguments, and distinguish facts from opinions. Limited evidence explains how complementary critical reading strategies function together in vocational Business English and how students perceive them.
Purpose: This study investigated how Indonesian vocational Business English students perceived and applied Stop-Paraphrase-Questioning (SPQ), Annotation, and Journaling, and their benefits and challenges in reading workplace business texts.
Method: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design involved 30 second-semester vocational students. Questionnaire data were analyzed using frequencies and percentages; observations and reading tasks showed strategy use; interviews were thematically analyzed to explain quantitative patterns, with findings integrated during interpretation.
Results: Journaling was selected most often (23 of 65 responses; 35%), followed by SPQ and Annotation (21 each; 32%). Students associated the strategies with broader perspectives (40%), idea analysis (27%), and key information identification (21%); reflective self-evaluation was least identified (12%). The main challenge was interpreting implicit information (16 of 30 students; 53%), followed by limited background knowledge (23%) and vocabulary (13%). Students reported stronger focus on main ideas and willingness to analyze texts, but argument evaluation, fact–opinion distinction, and text-based opinions remained limited.
Conclusion: Students perceived the strategies as supporting focused engagement with workplace Business English texts, particularly comprehension monitoring and key information identification. The findings indicate perceived instructional value, not causal improvement or increased motivation. Its originality lies in examining SPQ, Annotation, and Journaling as complementary stages of comprehension monitoring, textual analysis, and metacognitive reflection. Explicit modeling and scaffolding remain necessary to strengthen inferential reasoning and evaluative judgment.
Full text article
References
Aida, S. N., & Widiyati, E. (2020). Extensive Reading to Improve Students’ Writing of Explanation Text. Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 5(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.5.1.
Akbar, F. (2014). The Role of Reading in Improving Speaking Skill in the Context of Teaching English as a Foreign Language. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 2(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15946
Arifin, A. A. A., Malihah, N., & Nabella, A. C. R. (2025). Factors of EFL Students’ Language Anxiety in English Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 304–319. https://ojspanel.undikma.ac.id/index.php/jtp/article/view/14480/7136
Ba?, H. K., & Gürsoy, E. (2021). The Effect of Critical Thinking Embedded English Course Design to the Improvement of Critical Thinking Skills of Secondary School Learners. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 76 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100910
Bui, T. N., & Macalister, J. (2021). Online Extensive Reading in an EFL Context: Investigating Reading Fluency and Perceptions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(1), 1 – 29. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1296424.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publication, Inc.
García-Rodicio, H. (2014). Support for Learning from Multimedia Explanations. A Comparison of Prompting, Signaling, and Questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.50.1.b
Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2014). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 17(1), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.005
Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and Researching Reading (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743
Islamiyah, K., & Ni’mah, F. (2024). Students’ Perception of Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching reading. Langua: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, 7(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13221846
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Lindawati, R. (2021). Students’ Perceptions towards Extensive Reading in EFL Contexts. International Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistic, 1(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/doi.org/ijeal.v1n1.1044
Octavianti, Z. D., Retnaningdyah, P., & Munir, A. (2023). Undergraduate Students’ Perception of Using Extensive Reading Strategy in Vocabulary Mastery. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(5), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i5.402
Ramadhianti, A., & Somba, S. (2023). Reading Comprehension Difficulties in Indonesian EFL Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Literature (JELTL), 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47080/jeltl.v6i1.2477
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative Inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505056
Rodrigues, P., Pallathadka, H., Askar, S., Prasad, K., & Amir, A. A. (2024). The Building Blocks of Language Learning via CALL: Practicing Critical Thinking Strategies in Reading Comprehension Instruction and its Reflection on EFL Learners’ Mindfulness, Resilience, and Academic Growth. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 25(4), 97–123. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/download/486/403
Suryani, Y., & Siminto. (2023). Student and Teacher Perceptions of Extensive Reading Practice. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(2), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v1i2.8
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Rika Wahyuni Tambunan, Sri Hardiningsih, Betharia br Sembiring Pandia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.