THE CARBON FOOTPRINT OF HYBRID LEARNING: A STUDY ON THE ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF DIGITAL EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND PATHWAYS TO SUSTAINABILITY
Abstract
The growing prevalence of hybrid learning has brought not only pedagogical innovation but also environmental concerns related to the digital infrastructure supporting education. This study examines the carbon footprint of hybrid learning environments, focusing on the energy consumption of devices, data centers, and network systems in Indonesian universities. The research aims to quantify energy use patterns in digital education and propose pathways toward sustainability in hybrid learning models. A mixed-method approach was adopted, combining quantitative analysis of institutional energy consumption data with qualitative interviews involving IT managers, educators, and policymakers. Life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques were applied to measure the carbon emissions associated with online teaching platforms, hardware utilization, and classroom technologies. Results revealed that hybrid learning systems consume 25–40% more energy than traditional classrooms, primarily due to prolonged use of cloud-based services and audiovisual streaming. However, the integration of smart energy management systems and renewable-powered data centers demonstrated a potential 30% reduction in total emissions. Qualitative data highlighted a lack of institutional awareness about digital sustainability, indicating that environmental education must be integrated into hybrid learning policies. The study concludes that achieving sustainable hybrid education requires a holistic redesign of digital infrastructure, integrating green computing, eco-efficient pedagogy, and behavioral awareness among users. These findings contribute to the emerging discourse on the ecological impact of educational technology and propose actionable strategies for carbon reduction in the digital learning ecosystem.
Full text article
References
Benito, N., Pérez-Martínez, J. C., Roldán, J. B., Lao, Á., Urbina, A., & Serrano-Luján, L. (2025). Life cycle assessment of digital memories: The memristor’s environmental footprint. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 48, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2025.101229
Dong, X., Dong, D., & Yu, Q. (2024). Impact of oil, gold, and energy prices on resources footprint: Evaluating the role of digital governance and financial development. Resources Policy, 92, 105001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105001
Eliades, T., Adel, S. M., Akyalçin, S., Atsawasuwan, P., Foong, K. WC., Hiskia, A., Panayi, N., Silikas, N., Allareddy, V., Venugopal, A., Dellinger, A., Perillo, L., & Vaiid, N. (2025). Environmental footprints in orthodontics: The World Federation of Orthodontists’ white paper on sustainable practices, challenges and research imperatives. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists, 14(4), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.06.003
Gibbons, S., Watts, C., White, S., & Bach, L. (2025). Investigating awareness and behavioural intentions from AI water footprint digital posters in higher education settings. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101533
Hu, M., Li, Y., Xiong, W., & Yuan, J. (2025). Can digital inclusive finance suppress energy ecological footprint? Moderated mediation effect test based on technological innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 103, 104491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104491
Lin, W., Wang, C.-W., Li, Y.-J., & Chen, J.-Y. (2025). From green to digital: Exploring the role of ecological footprints on cybersecurity risk. Energy Economics, 146, 108546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108546
Liu, X., Wu, S., Yue, T., & Lyu, W. (2025). Study on the impact mechanism of digital economy spatial network on regional carbon footprint. Environmental Challenges, 20, 101188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101188
Liu, Y., & Chen, K. (2024). Integrated effect of financial development and digital trade on resources footprint: Role of and agricultural value added in MINT countries. Resources Policy, 90, 104707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104707
Magrizos, S. (2025). The dark side of companies’ digital transformation: The carbon footprint of online activities. International Marketing Review, 42(6), 1360–1381. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2024-0398
Niero, M., Rossi, F., Brullo, G., Pooley, T., Deacon, J., Gombac, A., & Frey, M. (2025). A data-driven modular approach to the digitalization of maintenance services: The case study of a Carbon Footprint calculator for Ricoh Europe. 32nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering (LCE2025), 135, 818–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.075
Noodaeng, S., Petchmedyai, P., Janthasen, A., Ponthip, A., Neamhom, T., & Patthanaissaranukool, W. (2025). Comparative carbon footprint analysis of semi-digital and fully digital implant-supported prosthesis fabrication processes. Environmental Challenges, 20, 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101294
Ren, X., Zhao, M., & Gao, P. (2024). The inverted U-effect of digital financial inclusion on household food carbon footprint in China: The moderating roles of environmental concern and future expectations. Energy, 313, 133727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133727
Sindhu, M. I., Naveed, M., & Almulhim, A. A. (2025). From carbon footprints to digital footprints: Return transmission between AI and renewable energy markets. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101529
Škare, M., Gavurova, B., & Porada-Rochon, M. (2024). Digitalization and carbon footprint: Building a path to a sustainable economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123045
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Roya Zahir, Dorji Wangchuk, Sanjay Sharma, Ramin Rahimi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.