Beyond Immersion: A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Augmented Reality (AR) versus Traditional Laboratory Settings

Ravi Dara (1), Roya Zahir (2), Jamil Khan (3)
(1) South East University, Cambodia,
(2) Kunduz University, Afghanistan,
(3) Jawzjan University, Afghanistan

Abstract

Background: The integration of Augmented Reality (AR) in education has garnered attention for its potential to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. While much of the research focuses on the immersive nature of AR, its impact on cognitive learning outcomes compared to traditional laboratory-based learning environments remains underexplored. Traditional laboratory settings have long been the gold standard for hands-on, experiential learning, but the emergence of AR technologies offers a promising alternative for interactive and personalized learning experiences.


Purpose: This study aims to compare the cognitive learning outcomes of students who engage with content in AR environments versus those who participate in traditional laboratory settings. The research seeks to determine whether AR offers significant advantages in terms of knowledge retention, problem-solving, and conceptual understanding.


Method: A mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative pre- and post-test assessments to measure cognitive outcomes and qualitative focus group discussions to capture students' experiences. The study involved 200 students, with 100 participating in AR-based learning and 100 in traditional laboratory settings.


Results: The AR group showed a greater improvement in cognitive learning outcomes (23% increase) compared to the traditional laboratory group (14% increase). Students in the AR environment also reported higher levels of engagement, which correlated with their cognitive improvements.


Conclusion: AR-based learning environments offer significant cognitive benefits over traditional laboratory settings, particularly in enhancing conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. These findings suggest that AR could complement or even replace traditional methods in certain educational contexts.


 

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Akpabio, E., Agarmore, S., Kumar, A., Pandhare, M., Kumar, A., & Gaurav, K. (2025). Information Technology as a Catalyst for Change in Education: From Traditional Classrooms to Digital Learning Spaces. Dalam M. S. Kaiser, J. Xie, & V. S. Rathore (Ed.), Lect. Notes Networks Syst.: Vol. 1381 LNNS (hlm. 23–33). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5607-3_3

Albawaneh, A., Murthy, S. V., Singla, G., Wu, J., & Kim, H. (2023). Augmented Reality Order Picking Aid for Foreign Workers in Warehouses. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc, 67(1), 1508–1509. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192868

Álvarez-Marín, A., Paredes-Velasco, M., Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á., & Palma-Chilla, L. (2025). Insights into usability, academic outcomes, and emotional responses in an AR-Interactive learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(4), 3147–3161. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2440862

Álvarez-Marín, A., Paredes-Velasco, M., Velázquez-Iturbide, J. Á., & Poblete-Castro, J. C. (2023). Augmented reality and education in electronics: Relationship between usability, academic performance, and emotions experienced in learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1750–1760. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22670

Bonavolontà, F., Monaco, A., Caputo, E., & Liccardo, A. (2025). IM-MetaLAB: the first digital laboratory for teaching the fundamental concepts of instrumentation and measurement in metaverse. Scientific Reports, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-29553-7

Cao, J., Zhao, G., Li, S., Sun, J., & Wu, Z. (2025). Augmented Motion Representation Learning Based on Virtual Reality Sports Game Review Data. Dalam J. Y. C. Chen, G. Fragomeni, N. A. Streitz, S. Konomi, & X. Fang (Ed.), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.: Vol. 15377 LNCS (hlm. 296–310). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76812-5_20

Chaudhari, R., Goodrum, P., Brady, N., Jones, M., Hallowell, M., Yeh, T., & Bhandari, S. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Augmented Reality on Work Performance in a Full-Scale MEP Assembly Task: Study of Industry and Novice Populations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(12). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-16726

Chen, M., Li, Y., Shrestha, H., Rakotondravony, N., Teixeira, A., Harrison, L., & Dempski, R. E. (2024). FlowAR: A Mixed Reality Program to Introduce Continuous Flow Concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(5), 1865–1874. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00807

Cheng, Y. F., Carden, A., Cho, H., Fidalgo, C. G., Wieland, J., & Lindlbauer, D. (2025). Augmented Reality Productivity In-the-Wild: A Diary Study of Usage Patterns and Experiences of Working With AR Laptops in Real-World Settings. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(10), 9195–9212. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3592962

Crane, E. E., Bailey, M. S., Green, J. C., Herchek, J. L., Hrivnak, J. W., Massey, B. F., Seery, R. D., Tobias, J. N., & White, H. R. (2024). From Drafting Boards to Virtual Reality: The Evolution of Mechanical Engineering and Design. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (Applied Physics Laboratory), 37(3), 245–255. Scopus.

Damasevicius, R. (2025). Immersive holographic learning for next generation personalized STEAM education. Dalam Integrating personalized learn. Methods into STEAM educ. (hlm. 405–438). IGI Global; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7718-5.ch018

Ding, S., Lu, T., Lv, X., Zhang, Y., Deng, R., & Huang, X. (2026). Augmented reality for enhancing educational experience in laboratory safety training. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 100. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105848

Grodotzki, J., Müller, B. T., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2023). Enhancing manufacturing education based on controller-free augmented reality learning. Manufacturing Letters, 35, 1246–1254. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.08.068

Hadjichristou, C., Kokoti, M., & Bakopoulou, A. (2024). Haptics in fixed prosthodontics and their role in dental education: A literature review. Journal of Dental Education, 88(8), 1020–1028. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13533

Hernández-Rodríguez, F. (2023). Augmented Reality for Self-management of Learning in Manufacturing Laboratories (AR-ManufacturingLab). Dalam Lect. Notes Educ. Technol. (hlm. 478–486). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_49

Hernández-Rodríguez, F., & Guillén-Yparrea, N. (2023). Competencies Development Strategy Using Augmented Reality for Self-Management of Learning in Manufacturing Laboratories (AR-ManufacturingLab). Heliyon, 9(11). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22072

Hong, Z., Choi, B., & Boh, W. (2024). Beyond (J)ust a (R)ather (V)ery (I)ntelligent (S)ystem: Can You Outdo Ironman Troubleshooting Complex Technical Problems? Int. Conf. Inf. Syst., ICIS. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105010824977&partnerID=40&md5=828556baa3efebba12389ec185435520

Iriqat, S., & Vatansever, F. (2025). Augmented Reality in Engineering Education: An Application for Electronic Circuits Laboratory. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 36(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.70018

Jia, Y., Bulbul, T., & Gabbard, J. L. (2026). Evaluation of Trade-Offs in Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays for Construction Assembly: Task Performance and Cognitive and Physical Ergonomics. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 32(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-2120

Khan, S., Panuwatwanich, K., & Usanavasin, S. (2024). Integrating building information modeling with augmented reality: Application and empirical assessment in building facility management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(7), 2809–2828. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2021-1146

Khang, N. T., Tran, N.-H., & Phan, N.-P.-Q. (2023). Augmented Reality Application in Digital Automation Laboratory. Proc. - Int. Symp. Electr. Electron. Eng., ISEE, 133–138. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE59483.2023.10299885

Kuanbayeva, B., Shazhdekeyeva, N., Zhusupkaliyeva, G., Mukhtarkyzy, K., & Abildinova, G. (2024). Investigating the Role of Augmented Reality in Supporting Collaborative Learning in Science Education: A Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(1), 149–161. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i1.42391

Kundzierewicz, M., Ko?odziej, K., Khokhar, A., Tsung-Ying, T., Le?niak, A., Zakrzewski, P., Borecki, H., Bohn, E., Hecko, J., Januška, J., Precek, D., Stanuch, M., Skalski, A., Onuma, Y., Serruys, P., Bruining, N., Z?ahoda-Huzior, A., & Dudek, D. (2025). Catheterization laboratories open the doors for Extended Realities—Review of clinical applications in cardiology. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 6(5), 1055–1068. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf072

Müller, B. T., Grodotzki, J., & Tekkaya, A. E. (2023). Augmented Reality Image Correlation App: Algorithms and Synthetic Verification. Dalam M. E. Auer, R. Langmann, & T. Tsiatsos (Ed.), Lect. Notes Networks Syst.: Vol. 763 LNNS (hlm. 441–454). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42467-0_41

Parvathavarthini, S., Lakshmi, K., Pyingkodi, M., Harshini, J., Manjarika, B. S., & Yuthithra, M. (2025). Augmented Reality Companion for Interactive Science Laboratory Simulations. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Sustain. Syst., ICISS, 575–580. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS63372.2025.11076498

Parwata, I. G. L. A., Yoda, I. K., & Swadesi, I. K. I. (2025). Development of augmented reality-based musculoskeletal system anatomy learning modules to improve learning outcomes of physical education students. Perinatal Journal, 33(3), 17–27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.57239/prn.25.0333002

Sattar, M. A., Maqbool, M. U., Zakir, F., & Billah, M. (2025). Enhancing student engagement through augmented reality in secondary biology education. Frontiers in Education, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1628004

Spadoni, E., Carulli, M., Ferrise, F., & Bordegoni, M. (2023). Impact of Multisensory XR Technologies on Museum Exhibition Visits. Dalam M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Lect. Notes Comput. Sci.: Vol. 14021 LNCS (hlm. 120–132). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35897-5_9

Sun, J. C.-Y., Ye, S.-L., Yu, S.-J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). Effects of Wearable Hybrid AR/VR Learning Material on High School Students’ Situational Interest, Engagement, and Learning Performance: The Case of a Physics Laboratory Learning Environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 1–12. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10001-4

van den Driessche, G. A., Bailey, D., Anderson, E. O., Tarselli, M. A., & Blackwell, L. (2023). Improving protein therapeutic development through cloud-based data integration. SLAS Technology, 28(5), 293–301. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slast.2023.07.002

Wang, J., Li, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, C. (2025). Before and After: How Did the Pandemic Reshape Virtual Laboratory Research? SAGE Open, 15(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251339961

Zhang, N., & Liu, Y. (2023). Design and implementation of virtual laboratories for higher education sustainability: A case study of Nankai University. Frontiers in Education, 8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1322263

Authors

Ravi Dara
ravidara12@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Roya Zahir
Jamil Khan
Dara, R., Zahir, R., & Khan, J. (2026). Beyond Immersion: A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Learning Outcomes in Augmented Reality (AR) versus Traditional Laboratory Settings. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education, 3(6), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.70177/jete.v3i6.3188

Article Details