Production-Embedded Curriculum Enactment and Meaning-Making in Teaching Factory: An Interpretive Case Study of Shrimp Aquaculture Vocational Education in Indonesia

Dani Darmawan (1), Dedy Achmad Kurniady (2), Aan Komariah (3), Taufani C Kurniatun (4)
(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, ID Indonesia,
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, ID Indonesia,
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, ID Indonesia,
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, ID Indonesia

Abstract

Background. Teaching Factory has been widely promoted as a strategy for strengthening school–industry linkages in vocational education, yet it is often understood primarily through competency alignment and procedural replication. In production-intensive sectors such as shrimp aquaculture, curriculum relevance depends not only on formal alignment but also on learners’ participation in real production systems shaped by technological standards, biological cycles, quality regimes, contractual arrangements, and market timing.


Purpose. This study examines how Teaching Factory functions as a production-embedded mechanism of curriculum enactment in an Indonesian vocational secondary school located within a shrimp aquaculture ecosystem.


Method. An interpretive qualitative case study design was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, direct observations, and institutional document analysis conducted across one complete shrimp cultivation cycle.


Results. The findings show that the Teaching Factory operates as an embedded production and economic unit rather than a simulated workshop. Curriculum standards are enacted through full-cycle shrimp cultivation, distributed school–industry roles, technological upgrading, contractual harvesting arrangements, and market-based quality requirements. Curriculum relevance is therefore produced through operational embeddedness rather than formal alignment alone.


Conclusion. By conceptualizing Teaching Factory as a mediating infrastructure between curriculum policy, industry governance, technological practice, and regional commodity production, this study contributes to vocational curriculum scholarship and offers a context-sensitive account of curriculum relevance in production-intensive TVET settings.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. Routledge.

Billett, S. (2011). Vocational Education: Purposes, Traditions and Prospects. Springer.

Carcary, M. (2020). The research audit trail: Methodological guidance for application in practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008

Billett, S. (2020). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

CEDEFOP. (2020). Vocational education and training in Europe, 1995–2035: Scenarios for European vocational education and training in the 21st century. Publications Office of the European Union.

Ferns, S. J., Zegwaard, K. E., Pretti, T. J., & Rowe, A. D. (2025). Defining and designing work-integrated learning curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(2), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2399072

Dwijayanthi, K. D., & Rijanto, T. (2022). Implementation of Teaching Factory (TEFA) in vocational school to improve student work readiness. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v5i1.5922

Mahmudah, F. N., & Santosa, B. (2021). Vocational school alignment based-on industry needs. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 4(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v4i1.3611

Coe, N. M., & Yeung, H. W. -c. (2015). Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford University Press.

Husband, G. (2020). Ethical data collection and recognizing the impact of semi-structured interviews on research respondents. Education Sciences, 10(8), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080206

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311

Kajamaa, A., Mattick, K., & de la Croix, A. (2020). How to … assess the quality of qualitative research. The Clinical Teacher, 17(6), 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242

Li, Y., Hsu, W.-L., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Evaluation study on the ecosystem governance of industry–education integration platform in China. Sustainability, 14(20), 13208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013208

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Lynch, J., Auld, G., O’Mara, J., & Cloonan, A. (2023). Teachers’ everyday work-for-change: Implementing curriculum policy in ‘disadvantaged’ schools. Journal of Education Policy, 39(4), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2245794

McGrath, S., & Powell, L. (2016). Skills for sustainable development: Transforming vocational education and training beyond 2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 50, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.006

OECD. (2010). Learning for Jobs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264087460-en

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Omar, M., & Kamaruzaman, F. M. (2024). Technical and vocational education training and industry collaboration: A bibliometric review. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1582–1592. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21120

Prosser, C. A., & Allen, C. R. (1925). Vocational Education in a Democracy. Century Company.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219426

Raelin, J. A. (2008). Work-Based Learning: Bridging Knowledge and Action in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass.

Rifai, D. S., Ardiansyah, A., Yahya, A. I. B., & Fitriyani, R. (2026). The implementation of Teaching Factory in vocational education: A systematic review. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 38(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v38i1.13289

Rauner, F., & Maclean, R. (2008). Handbook of Technical and Vocational Education and Training Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8347-1

UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2024). Elevating TVET for a just and sustainable future for all: UNESCO-UNEVOC medium-term strategy 2024–2026. UNESCO International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389359

UNESCO. (2021). Strategy for technical and vocational education and training (TVET) 2022–2029: Transforming TVET for successful and just transitions. UNESCO.

Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why Knowledge Matters in Curriculum: A Social Realist Argument. Routledge.

Wahjusaputri, S., & Bunyamin, B. (2022). Development of teaching factory competency-based for vocational secondary education in Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21709

Wu, M., & Sarker, M. N. I. (2022). Assessment of multiple subjects’ synergetic governance in vocational education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 947665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947665

The World Bank, UNESCO, & ILO. (2023). Building better formal TVET systems: Principles and practice in low- and middle-income countries. The World Bank, UNESCO, and ILO.

Zegwaard, K. E., Pretti, T. J., Rowe, A. D., & Ferns, S. J. (2023). Defining work-integrated learning. In K. E. Zegwaard & T. J. Pretti (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of work-integrated learning (3rd ed., pp. 29–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003156420

Xu, W. (2025). Sustainable innovations in shrimp aquaculture: Current advances and future horizons. Fishes, 10(10), 498. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes10100498

Zornu, J., Tavornpanich, S., Shimaa, A. E., Addo, S. A., Nyaga, P., Dverdal, M. J. J., Norheim, K., Brun, E., & Cudjoe, K. S. (2023). Bridging knowledge gaps in fish health management through education, research, and biosecurity. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1256860. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1256860

Paul, M. N., Kasan, N. A., Oben, B. O. M., & Osho, F. E. (2025). A review of technological developments in shrimp aquaculture production. Indonesian Aquaculture Journal, 20(2).

Wheelahan, L. (2015). Not just skills: What a focus on knowledge means for vocational education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(6), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1089942

Authors

Dani Darmawan
dani.darmawan@upi.edu (Primary Contact)
Dedy Achmad Kurniady
Aan Komariah
Taufani C Kurniatun
Darmawan, D., Kurniady, D. A., Komariah, A., & Kurniatun, T. C. (2026). Production-Embedded Curriculum Enactment and Meaning-Making in Teaching Factory: An Interpretive Case Study of Shrimp Aquaculture Vocational Education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 4(4), 1559–1571. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v4i4.4205

Article Details

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.